Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 1;88(3):565-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.232. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Lymphedema after breast cancer treatment can be an irreversible condition with a negative impact on quality of life. The goal of this study was to identify radiation therapy-related risk factors for lymphedema. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2005 to 2012, we prospectively performed arm volume measurements on 1476 breast cancer patients at our institution using a Perometer. Treating each breast individually, 1099 of 1501 patients (73%) received radiation therapy. Arm measurements were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Lymphedema was defined as ≥10% arm volume increase occurring >3 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate risk factors for lymphedema. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 25.4 months (range, 3.4-82.6 months), the 2-year cumulative incidence of lymphedema was 6.8%. Cumulative incidence by radiation therapy type was as follows: 3.0% no radiation therapy, 3.1% breast or chest wall alone, 21.9% supraclavicular (SC), and 21.1% SC and posterior axillary boost (PAB). On multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio for regional lymph node radiation (RLNR) (SC ± PAB) was 1.7 (P=.025) compared with breast/chest wall radiation alone. There was no difference in lymphedema risk between SC and SC + PAB (P=.96). Other independent risk factors included early postoperative swelling (P<.0001), higher body mass index (P<.0001), greater number of lymph nodes dissected (P=.018), and axillary lymph node dissection (P=.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of breast cancer patients prospectively screened for lymphedema, RLNR significantly increased the risk of lymphedema compared with breast/chest wall radiation alone. When considering use of RLNR, clinicians should weigh the potential benefit of RLNR for control of disease against the increased risk of lymphedema.
目的:乳腺癌治疗后发生淋巴水肿是一种不可逆转的状况,会对生活质量产生负面影响。本研究的目的是确定与放射治疗相关的淋巴水肿风险因素。
方法和材料:从 2005 年到 2012 年,我们在机构内使用 Perometer 对 1476 例乳腺癌患者进行前瞻性手臂体积测量。1501 例患者中的 1099 例(73%)单独接受乳房治疗,接受放射治疗。在术前和术后进行手臂测量。淋巴水肿定义为术后超过 3 个月手臂体积增加≥10%。使用单变量和多变量 Cox 比例风险模型评估淋巴水肿的风险因素。
结果:中位随访时间为 25.4 个月(范围 3.4-82.6 个月),2 年淋巴水肿累积发生率为 6.8%。按放射治疗类型的累积发生率如下:无放射治疗为 3.0%,乳房或胸壁单独放射治疗为 3.1%,锁骨上(SC)为 21.9%,SC 和后腋区(PAB)加量为 21.1%。多变量分析显示,区域淋巴结放射治疗(RLNR)(SC ± PAB)的风险比为 1.7(P=.025),与乳房/胸壁放射治疗单独相比。SC 和 SC + PAB 之间的淋巴水肿风险无差异(P=.96)。其他独立的风险因素包括术后早期肿胀(P<.0001)、较高的体重指数(P<.0001)、切除的淋巴结数量更多(P=.018)和腋窝淋巴结清扫术(P=.0001)。
结论:在对淋巴水肿进行前瞻性筛查的大型乳腺癌患者队列中,RLNR 与乳房/胸壁放射治疗单独相比显著增加了淋巴水肿的风险。在考虑使用 RLNR 时,临床医生应权衡 RLNR 对疾病控制的潜在益处与增加的淋巴水肿风险。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014-1-7
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015-3-15
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018-8-28
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008-12-1
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003-4-1
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019-6-28
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013-8-4
South Asian J Cancer. 2024-2-16
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2023-9-30
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012-5-30
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011-11-16
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011-7-15