Chandra Ravi A, Miller Cynthia L, Skolny Melissa N, Warren Laura E G, Horick Nora, Jammallo Lauren S, Sadek Betro T, Shenouda Mina N, O'Toole Jean, Specht Michelle C, Taghian Alphonse G
Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 15;91(4):760-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.12.029.
We previously evaluated the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) with the addition of regional lymph node irradiation (RLNR) and found an increased risk when RLNR is used. Here we analyze the association of technical radiation therapy (RT) factors in RLNR patients with the risk of LE development.
From 2005 to 2012, we prospectively screened 1476 women for LE who underwent surgery for breast cancer. Among 1507 breasts treated, 172 received RLNR and had complete technical data for analysis. RLNR was delivered as supraclavicular (SC) irradiation (69% [118 of 172 patients]) or SC plus posterior axillary boost (PAB) (31% [54 of 172]). Bilateral arm volume measurements were performed pre- and postoperatively. Patients' RT plans were analyzed for SC field lateral border (relative to the humeral head), total dose to SC, RT fraction size, beam energy, and type of tangent (normal vs wide). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze associated risk factors for LE.
Median postoperative follow-up was 29.3 months (range: 4.9-74.1 months). The 2-year cumulative incidence of LE was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15%-32%) for SC and 20% (95% CI: 11%-37%) for SC plus PAB (SC+PAB). None of the analyzed variables was significantly associated with LE risk (extent of humeral head: P=.74 for <1/3 vs >2/3, P=.41 for 1/3 to 2/3 vs >2/3; P=.40 for fraction size of 1.8 Gy vs 2.0 Gy; P=.57 for beam energy 6 MV vs 10 MV; P=.74 for tangent type wide vs regular; P=.66 for SC vs SC+PAB). Only pretreatment body mass index (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04-1.15, P=.0007) and the use of axillary lymph node dissection (HR: 7.08, 95% CI: 0.98-51.40, P=.05) were associated with risk of subsequent LE development.
Of the RT parameters tested, none was associated with an increased risk of LE development. This study underscores the need for future work investigating alternative RLNR risk factors for LE.
我们之前评估了加用区域淋巴结照射(RLNR)后乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(LE)的风险,发现使用RLNR时风险增加。在此,我们分析接受RLNR的患者中放射治疗(RT)技术因素与LE发生风险之间的关联。
2005年至2012年,我们前瞻性地筛查了1476例接受乳腺癌手术的女性是否发生LE。在接受治疗的1507个乳房中,172个接受了RLNR且有完整的技术数据用于分析。RLNR采用锁骨上(SC)照射(69%[172例患者中的118例])或SC加腋窝后野补充照射(PAB)(31%[172例中的54例])。术前和术后均进行双侧手臂体积测量。分析患者的RT计划,包括SC野的外侧边界(相对于肱骨头)、SC的总剂量、RT分次剂量、射线能量以及切线类型(常规与宽切线)。采用Cox比例风险模型分析LE的相关危险因素。
术后中位随访时间为29.3个月(范围:4.9 - 74.1个月)。SC照射组LE的2年累积发生率为22%(95%置信区间[CI]:15% - 32%),SC加PAB(SC + PAB)组为20%(95% CI:11% - 37%)。所分析的变量均与LE风险无显著关联(肱骨头范围:<1/3与>2/3相比,P = 0.74;1/3至2/3与>2/3相比,P = 0.41;1.8 Gy与2.0 Gy的分次剂量相比,P = 0.40;6 MV与10 MV的射线能量相比,P = 0.57;宽切线与常规切线类型相比,P = 0.74;SC与SC + PAB相比,P = 0.66)。仅治疗前体重指数(风险比[HR]:1.09;95% CI:1.04 - 1.15,P = 0.0007)和腋窝淋巴结清扫的使用(HR:7.08,95% CI:0.98 - 51.40,P = 0.05)与随后发生LE的风险相关。
在所测试的RT参数中,没有一个与LE发生风险增加相关。本研究强调未来需要开展工作,研究LE的其他RLNR危险因素。