• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后台:洛克菲勒基金会与世界卫生组织的关系,第一部分:1940 年代至 1960 年代。

Backstage: the relationship between the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Health Organization, Part I: 1940s-1960s.

机构信息

Centre for Critical Development Studies and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Room 558, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.

出版信息

Public Health. 2014 Feb;128(2):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2013.11.010
PMID:24412372
Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing debate about what role foundations should play in global health governance generally, and particularly vis-à-vis the World Health Organization (WHO). Much of this discussion revolves around today's gargantuan philanthropy, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and its sway over the agenda and modus operandi of global health. Yet such pre-occupations are not new. The Rockefeller Foundation (RF), the unparalleled 20th century health philanthropy heavyweight, both profoundly shaped WHO and maintained long and complex relations with it, even as both institutions changed over time. This article examines the WHO-RF relationship from the 1940s to the 1960s, tracing its ebbs and flows, key moments, challenges, and quandaries, concluding with a reflection on the role of the Cold War in both fully institutionalizing the RF's dominant disease-control approach and limiting its smaller social medicine efforts, even as the RF's quotidian influence at WHO diminished.

摘要

近年来,人们对于基金会在全球卫生治理中应扮演何种角色,尤其是在世界卫生组织(WHO)方面,展开了越来越多的讨论。这场讨论的核心主要围绕当今规模庞大的慈善机构——比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会(Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation),以及它对全球卫生议程和运作模式的影响。然而,此类关注并非新鲜事物。洛克菲勒基金会(RF)作为 20 世纪无可比拟的卫生慈善事业巨头,对 WHO 产生了深远的影响,并与其保持着长期而复杂的关系,即使这两个机构随着时间的推移而发生变化。本文从 20 世纪 40 年代到 60 年代,考察了 WHO 和 RF 的关系,追溯了其兴衰、关键节点、挑战和困境,并最终反思了冷战在将 RF 主导的疾病控制方法完全制度化以及限制其较小的社会医学努力方面所起的作用,尽管 RF 在 WHO 的日常影响力有所减弱。

相似文献

1
Backstage: the relationship between the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Health Organization, Part I: 1940s-1960s.后台:洛克菲勒基金会与世界卫生组织的关系,第一部分:1940 年代至 1960 年代。
Public Health. 2014 Feb;128(2):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
2
Eradication, control or neither? Hookworm vs malaria strategies and Rockefeller Public Health in Mexico.根除、控制还是两者皆不?钩虫病与疟疾防治策略以及洛克菲勒基金会在墨西哥的公共卫生工作
Parassitologia. 1998 Jun;40(1-2):137-47.
3
The disappearance of Dutch malaria and the Rockefeller Foundation.荷兰疟疾的消失与洛克菲勒基金会。
Parassitologia. 2000 Jun;42(1-2):111-5.
4
The Gospel of Wealth and the National Health: The Rockefeller Foundation and Social Medicine in Britain's NHS, 1945-60.
Bull Hist Med. 2020;94(1):91-124. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2020.0003.
5
Public health policy paradoxes: science and politics in the Rockefeller Foundation's hookworm campaign in Mexico in the 1920s.公共卫生政策悖论:20世纪20年代洛克菲勒基金会在墨西哥开展的钩虫防治运动中的科学与政治
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Nov;49(9):1197-213. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00160-4.
6
The origin of the medical research grant in the United States: the Rockefeller Foundation and the NIH Extramural Funding Program.美国医学研究资助的起源:洛克菲勒基金会与美国国立卫生研究院院外资助项目。
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2015 Apr;70(2):279-311. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrt074. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
Failure-as-success: multiple meanings of eradication in the Rockefeller Foundation Sardinia project, 1946-1951.失败即成功:1946 - 1951年洛克菲勒基金会撒丁岛项目中根除概念的多重含义
Parassitologia. 1998 Jun;40(1-2):117-30.
8
Philanthropy: the difficult art of giving.慈善事业:艰难的给予艺术。
Nature. 2013 May 16;497(7449):311-2. doi: 10.1038/497311a.
9
Philanthropy and the nation-state in global health: The Gates Foundation in India.慈善事业与全球卫生中的民族国家:印度的盖茨基金会。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Oct;13(10):1357-1368. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1414286. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
10
Technology and malaria control, 1930-1960: the career of Rockefeller Foundation engineer Frederick W. Knipe.技术与疟疾防治,1930 - 1960年:洛克菲勒基金会工程师弗雷德里克·W·克尼普的职业生涯
Parassitologia. 2000 Jun;42(1-2):59-68.

引用本文的文献

1
Historicising global nutrition: critical reflections on contested pasts and reimagined futures.历史化全球营养:对过去的争议和未来的想象的批判性反思。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006337.
2
Power analysis in health policy and systems research: a guide to research conceptualisation.卫生政策和体系研究中的功效分析:研究概念化指南。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007268.
3
Positioning global pharmacy research partnerships to advance health equity.定位全球药学研究伙伴关系以促进健康公平。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Nov;16(11):1619-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Lenses and levels: the why, what and how of measuring health system drivers of women's, children's and adolescents' health with a governance focus.透镜与层面:聚焦治理,衡量影响妇女、儿童及青少年健康的卫生系统驱动因素的原因、内容及方式。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 24;4(Suppl 4):e001316. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001316. eCollection 2019.
5
Infrastructure-building for Public Health : The World Health Organization and Tuberculosis Control in South Korea, 1945-1963.公共卫生基础设施建设:世界卫生组织与韩国的结核病控制,1945 - 1963年
Uisahak. 2019 Apr;28(1):89-138. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2019.28.89.
6
'Socialising' primary care? The Soviet Union, WHO and the 1978 Alma-Ata Conference.“社会化”初级医疗保健?苏联、世界卫生组织与1978年阿拉木图会议
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 24;3(Suppl 3):e000992. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000992. eCollection 2018.