Department of Botany, University of Georgia, 30602, Athens, GA, USA.
Planta. 1978 Jan;139(1):25-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00390805.
An evaluation was made of the extent which a Münch-type pressure flow mechanism (i.e., osmotically-generated pressure flow) might contribute to phloem transport in soybean. Estimates of sucrose concentrations in source (leaf) and sink (root) sieve tubes were obtained by a negativestaining procedure. Water potential measurements of the leaf and of the nutrient solution allowed calculation of the turgor pressures in source and sink sieve tubes. The turgor difference between source and sink sieve tubes was compared to that required to drive translocation at the observed velocity between the source and sink, as measured by [(14)C] photosynthate movement. Sieve-tube conductivity was calculated from the sieve-tube dimensions, assuming an essentially unobstructed pathway. In three experiments, the sucrose concentration was consistently higher in source sieve tubes (an average of 11.5%) than in sink sieve tubes (an average of 5.3%). The ratio of these values (2.3:1) agreed reasonably well with an earlier ratio for source/sink sieve tube concentrations of 1.8:1, obtained by quantitative microautoradiography. The resulting calculated turgor difference (an average of 4.1 bars) was adequate to drive a pressure flow mechanism at the observed translocation velocities (calculated to require a turgor difference of 1.2 to 4.6 bars). No other force need be presumed to be involved.
评估了 Münch 型压力流机制(即渗透压驱动的压力流)在大豆韧皮部运输中可能起到的作用。通过负染程序估计源(叶)和汇(根)筛管中的蔗糖浓度。叶片和营养液的水势测量允许计算源和汇筛管中的膨压差。将源和汇筛管之间的膨压差与以观察到的速度在源和汇之间驱动转运所需的膨压差进行比较,该速度通过 [(14)C]光合产物的运动来测量。假设筛管的路径基本无障碍,根据筛管的尺寸计算筛管的电导率。在三个实验中,源筛管中的蔗糖浓度(平均 11.5%)始终高于汇筛管中的浓度(平均 5.3%)。这些值的比值(2.3:1)与通过定量微放射性自显影术获得的源/汇筛管浓度的早期比值 1.8:1 相当吻合。由此计算出的膨压差(平均为 4.1 巴)足以在观察到的转运速度下驱动压力流机制(计算需要 1.2 至 4.6 巴的膨压差)。不需要假定其他力参与其中。