Schwienbacher Erich, Navarro-Cano Jose Antonio, Neuner Gilbert, Erschbamer Brigitta
Institute of Botany & Alpine Research Centre Obergurgl, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Flora. 2011 Oct;206(10-3):845-856. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2011.05.001.
In alpine species the classification of the various mechanisms underlying seed dormancy has been rather questionable and controversial. Thus, we investigated 28 alpine species to evaluate the prevailing types of dormancy. Embryo type and water impermeability of seed coats gave an indication of the potential seed dormancy class. To ascertain the actual dormancy class and level, we performed germination experiments comparing the behavior of seeds without storage, after cold-dry storage, after cold-wet storage, and scarification. We also tested the light requirement for germination in some species. Germination behavior was characterized using the final germination percentage and the mean germination time. Considering the effects of the pretreatments, a refined classification of the prevailing dormancy types was constructed based on the results of our pretreatments. Only two out of the 28 species that we evaluated had predominantly non-dormant seeds. Physiological dormancy was prevalent in 20 species, with deep physiological dormancy being the most abundant, followed by non-deep and intermediate physiological dormancy. Seeds of four species with underdeveloped embryos were assigned to the morphophysiologial dormancy class. An impermeable seed coat was identified in two species, with no additional physiological germination block. We defined these species as having physical dormancy. Light promoted the germination of seeds without storage in all but one species with physiological dormancy. In species with physical dormancy, light responses were of minor importance. We discuss our new classification in the context of former germination studies and draw implications for the timing of germination in the field.
在高山植物物种中,种子休眠背后各种机制的分类一直存在很大疑问且颇具争议。因此,我们研究了28种高山植物物种,以评估主要的休眠类型。胚的类型和种皮的不透水性为潜在的种子休眠类别提供了线索。为了确定实际的休眠类别和程度,我们进行了发芽实验,比较了未经贮藏、冷干贮藏、冷湿贮藏和划破种皮处理后种子的萌发行为。我们还测试了一些物种萌发对光照的需求。发芽行为通过最终发芽率和平均发芽时间来表征。考虑到预处理的影响,根据我们预处理的结果构建了主要休眠类型的精细分类。在我们评估的28个物种中,只有两个物种的种子主要是非休眠的。生理休眠在20个物种中普遍存在,其中深度生理休眠最为常见,其次是非深度和中度生理休眠。四个胚发育不全的物种的种子被归为形态生理休眠类别。在两个物种中鉴定出种皮不透水,且不存在额外的生理萌发障碍。我们将这些物种定义为具有物理休眠。除了一个具有生理休眠的物种外,光照促进了所有未经贮藏种子的萌发。在具有物理休眠的物种中,光照反应的重要性较小。我们在前人发芽研究的背景下讨论了我们的新分类,并得出了对田间发芽时间的启示。