Hibbard Paul B, Scott-Brown Kenneth C, Haigh Emma C, Adrain Melanie
School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom ; Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom.
Centre for Psychology, School of Social and Health Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 8;9(1):e84087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084087. eCollection 2014.
One of the greatest challenges in visual neuroscience is that of linking neural activity with perceptual experience. In the case of binocular depth perception, important insights have been achieved through comparing neural responses and the perception of depth, for carefully selected stimuli. One of the most important types of stimulus that has been used here is the anti-correlated random dot stereogram (ACRDS). In these stimuli, the contrast polarity of one half of a stereoscopic image is reversed. While neurons in cortical area V1 respond reliably to the binocular disparities in ACRDS, they do not create a sensation of depth. This discrepancy has been used to argue that depth perception must rely on neural activity elsewhere in the brain. Currently, the psychophysical results on which this argument rests are not clear-cut. While it is generally assumed that ACRDS do not support the perception of depth, some studies have reported that some people, some of the time, perceive depth in some types of these stimuli. Given the importance of these results for understanding the neural correlates of stereopsis, we studied depth perception in ACRDS using a large number of observers, in order to provide an unambiguous conclusion about the extent to which these stimuli support the perception of depth. We presented observers with random dot stereograms in which correlated dots were presented in a surrounding annulus and correlated or anti-correlated dots were presented in a central circular region. While observers could reliably report the depth of the central region for correlated stimuli, we found no evidence for depth perception in static or dynamic anti-correlated stimuli. Confidence ratings for stereoscopic perception were uniformly low for anti-correlated stimuli, but showed normal variation with disparity for correlated stimuli. These results establish that the inability of observers to perceive depth in ACRDS is a robust phenomenon.
视觉神经科学中最大的挑战之一是将神经活动与感知体验联系起来。在双眼深度感知方面,通过比较神经反应和精心挑选的刺激下的深度感知,已经取得了重要的见解。这里使用的最重要的刺激类型之一是反相关随机点立体图(ACRDS)。在这些刺激中,立体图像一半的对比度极性被反转。虽然皮层区域V1中的神经元对ACRDS中的双眼视差有可靠的反应,但它们不会产生深度感。这种差异被用来论证深度感知必须依赖于大脑其他部位的神经活动。目前,这一论点所依据的心理物理学结果并不明确。虽然一般认为ACRDS不支持深度感知,但一些研究报告称,有些人在某些时候能在某些类型的这些刺激中感知到深度。鉴于这些结果对于理解立体视觉的神经相关性很重要,我们使用大量观察者研究了ACRDS中的深度感知,以便就这些刺激支持深度感知的程度提供一个明确的结论。我们向观察者呈现随机点立体图,其中相关点呈现在周围的环形区域,相关或反相关点呈现在中央圆形区域。虽然观察者能够可靠地报告相关刺激下中央区域的深度,但我们没有发现静态或动态反相关刺激中有深度感知的证据。反相关刺激的立体感知置信度评级始终很低,但相关刺激的置信度评级随视差呈现正常变化。这些结果表明,观察者无法在ACRDS中感知深度是一个稳健的现象。