Dipiro N D, Saunders L L, Brotherton S, Kraft S, Krause J S
Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Spinal Cord. 2014 Apr;52(4):316-21. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.164. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
Cross-sectional cohort study.
To investigate a mediational model where pain (intensity and interference) and fatigue mediate the relationship between the use of mobility aids and moderate-to-severe depressive symptomatology among ambulatory participants with spinal cord injury (SCI).
A medical university in the southeastern United States.
Ambulatory adults (N=652) with chronic SCI responded to a mail-in survey. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was used to assess moderate-to-severe depressive symptomatology. The Brief Pain Inventory was used to assess pain intensity and interference, and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-5-item version was used to assess fatigue. Participants self-reported use of mobility aids.
On examining mobility aids used for ambulation, 65% were found to have used at least one aid. Severe pain intensity was reported by 11%, and 14% reported severe pain interference. Disabling fatigue was reported by 10% of the participants. Twenty-one percent (n=138) reported moderate-to-severe levels of depressive symptoms. On examining the relationships between mobility aids and depressive symptomatology, using people as a mobility aid was associated with increased odds of depressive symptomatology (2.6) and always using a wheelchair was associated with lower odds (0.3). However, these relationships were no longer significant after controlling for the mediating variables pain intensity, pain interference and fatigue.
Pain and fatigue mediate the relationship between usage of certain mobility aids and depressive symptomatology. The use of people to assist in ambulation is associated with greater odds of moderate-to-severe depressive symptomatology, while always using a wheelchair is associated with lower odds.
横断面队列研究。
探讨一种中介模型,在该模型中,疼痛(强度和干扰)以及疲劳在脊髓损伤(SCI)的门诊参与者中,介导了移动辅助工具的使用与中重度抑郁症状之间的关系。
美国东南部的一所医科大学。
患有慢性脊髓损伤的门诊成年人(N = 652)对邮寄调查做出回应。使用患者健康问卷 - 9评估中重度抑郁症状。使用简短疼痛问卷评估疼痛强度和干扰,使用改良疲劳影响量表 - 5项版本评估疲劳。参与者自行报告移动辅助工具的使用情况。
在检查用于行走的移动辅助工具时,发现65%的人至少使用了一种辅助工具。11%的人报告有严重的疼痛强度,14%的人报告有严重的疼痛干扰。10%的参与者报告有致残性疲劳。21%(n = 138)的人报告有中度至重度抑郁症状。在检查移动辅助工具与抑郁症状之间的关系时,将人作为移动辅助工具与抑郁症状的几率增加相关(2.6),而总是使用轮椅与较低的几率相关(0.3)。然而,在控制了中介变量疼痛强度、疼痛干扰和疲劳后,这些关系不再显著。
疼痛和疲劳介导了某些移动辅助工具的使用与抑郁症状之间的关系。使用人协助行走与中度至重度抑郁症状的几率增加相关,而总是使用轮椅与较低的几率相关。