Mehta Swati, Janzen Shannon, McIntyre Amanda, Iruthayarajah Jerome, Loh Eldon, Teasell Robert
Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Winter;24(1):37-43. doi: 10.1310/sci16-00027. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
To examine the difference in functional outcomes and therapy intensity among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with comorbid depression and pain symptoms compared to those without these symptoms. A retrospective chart review was conducted of 100 patients admitted to a specialized SCI inpatient rehabilitation unit. Standard demographic factors were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with comorbid depression and pain symptoms and those without. Outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Age, gender, level of injury, severity of injury, and FIM admission were included in the model as covariates. Main outcomes included FIM discharge, length of stay (LOS), intensity of therapy (total physical therapy time [PTt] and total occupational therapy time [OTt]), living arrangement, and vocational status. No significant difference was seen between the 2 groups in FIM discharge or OTt; however, those in the comorbidity group required significantly greater PTt than those without ( = .002). Those in the comorbid group also spent longer in inpatient rehabilitation ( = .005). The groups did not differ in postdischarge living arrangements or vocational status. Inpatient rehabilitation physical therapy and LOS differ substantially among individuals with comorbid depression and pain symptoms. This comorbidity may have a negative impact on functional recovery such that individuals may require more physical therapy time and longer LOS. This may also point to the increased resources required to manage individuals with SCI and comorbid depression and pain symptoms.
为了研究合并有抑郁和疼痛症状的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者与没有这些症状的患者在功能结局和治疗强度上的差异。对入住一家专门的SCI住院康复单元的100例患者进行了回顾性病历审查。收集了标准的人口统计学因素。患者被分为两组:合并有抑郁和疼痛症状的患者以及没有这些症状的患者。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)比较两组之间的结局。年龄、性别、损伤平面、损伤严重程度和FIM入院评分作为协变量纳入模型。主要结局包括FIM出院评分、住院时间(LOS)、治疗强度(物理治疗总时间[PTt]和职业治疗总时间[OTt])、居住安排和职业状况。两组在FIM出院评分或OTt方面没有显著差异;然而,合并症组的患者所需的PTt明显高于无合并症组(P = .002)。合并症组的患者在住院康复中的时间也更长(P = .005)。两组在出院后的居住安排或职业状况方面没有差异。合并有抑郁和疼痛症状的患者在住院康复中的物理治疗和LOS有很大差异。这种合并症可能对功能恢复有负面影响,以至于患者可能需要更多的物理治疗时间和更长的LOS。这也可能表明管理合并有抑郁和疼痛症状的SCI患者需要更多资源。