Suppr超能文献

急诊科儿科患者程序性镇静相关的不良事件。

Adverse events associated with procedural sedation in pediatric patients in the emergency department.

作者信息

Cudny Magdalena E, Wang N Ewen, Bardas Sandra L, Nguyen Carolyn N

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California.

Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, and Associate Director of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Hosp Pharm. 2013 Feb;48(2):134-42. doi: 10.1310/hpj4802-134.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the agents used by emergency medicine (EM) physicians in pediatric procedural sedation and the associated adverse events (AEs) and to provide recommendations for optimizing drug therapy in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study at Stanford Hospital's pediatric emergency department (ED) from April 2007 to April 2008 to determine the medications most frequently used in pediatric procedural sedation as well as their effectiveness and AEs. Patients, 18 years old or younger, who required procedural sedation in the pediatric ED were eligible for the study. The data collected included medical record number, sex, age, height, weight, procedure type and length, physician, and agents used. For each agent, the dose, route, time from administration to onset of sedation, duration of sedation, AEs, and sedation score were recorded. Use of supplemental oxygen and interventions during procedural sedation were also recorded.

RESULTS

We found that in a convenience sample of 196 children (202 procedures) receiving procedural sedation in a university-based ED, 8 different medications were used (ketamine, etomidate, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methohexital, midazolam, pentobarbital, and thiopental). Ketamine was the most frequently used medication (88%), regardless of the procedure. Only twice in the study was the medication that was initially used for procedural sedation changed completely. Fracture reduction was the most frequently performed procedure (41%), followed by laceration/suture repair (32%). There were no serious AEs reported.

CONCLUSION

EM-trained physicians can safely perform pediatric procedural sedation in the ED. In the pediatric ED, the most common procedure requiring conscious sedation is fracture reduction, with ketamine as the preferred agent.

摘要

目的

确定急诊医学(EM)医生在儿科程序性镇静中使用的药物及其相关不良事件(AE),并为优化儿科患者的药物治疗提供建议。

方法

我们于2007年4月至2008年4月在斯坦福医院儿科急诊科(ED)进行了一项前瞻性研究,以确定儿科程序性镇静中最常用的药物及其有效性和不良事件。18岁及以下需要在儿科急诊进行程序性镇静的患者符合研究条件。收集的数据包括病历号、性别、年龄、身高、体重、手术类型和时长、医生以及使用的药物。对于每种药物,记录剂量、给药途径、给药至镇静起效时间、镇静持续时间、不良事件和镇静评分。还记录了程序性镇静期间补充氧气的使用情况和干预措施。

结果

我们发现,在一所大学附属医院急诊科接受程序性镇静的196名儿童(202例手术)的便利样本中,使用了8种不同药物(氯胺酮、依托咪酯、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美索比妥、咪达唑仑、戊巴比妥和硫喷妥钠)。无论进行何种手术,氯胺酮都是最常用的药物(88%)。在研究中,最初用于程序性镇静的药物仅两次被完全更换。骨折复位是最常进行的手术(41%),其次是伤口缝合修复(32%)。未报告严重不良事件。

结论

接受过急诊医学培训的医生可以在急诊科安全地进行儿科程序性镇静。在儿科急诊科,最常见的需要清醒镇静的手术是骨折复位,氯胺酮是首选药物。

相似文献

2
Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):483-91. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)80050-x.
3
Ketamine/midazolam versus etomidate/fentanyl: procedural sedation for pediatric orthopedic reductions.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Jun;26(6):408-12. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181e057cd.
4
Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1090.
5
Pediatric Procedural Sedation in the Community Emergency Department: results from the ProSCED registry.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Apr;23(4):218-22. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31803e176c.
8
Procedural sedation in children with autism spectrum disorders in the emergency department.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1404-1408. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Setting.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 21;8(4):e2735. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002735. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Higher Mallampati Scores Are Not Associated with More Adverse Events During Pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia.
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):430-436. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.11.35913. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
3
Capnography versus standard monitoring for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 23;3(3):CD010698. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010698.pub2.
4
The risk of shorter fasting time for pediatric deep sedation.
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):607-612. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186598.

本文引用的文献

1
Serious adverse events during procedural sedation with ketamine.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 May;25(5):325-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181a341e0.
2
Sedation in the emergency department.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Aug;20(4):379-83. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32825a69f9.
3
Non-anesthesiologist-provided pediatric procedural sedation: an update.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Aug;20(4):365-72. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32825a6a0a.
5
Procedural sedation in the community emergency department: initial results of the ProSCED registry.
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;14(1):41-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.023. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
6
Sedation by non-anesthesiologists.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;18(3):263-4. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000169232.98808.36.
7
Procedural sedation and analgesia in children.
Lancet. 2006 Mar 4;367(9512):766-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68230-5.
8
Pharmacological management of pain and anxiety during emergency procedures in children.
Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(5):337-54. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200103050-00003.
9
Use of intravenous methohexital as a sedative in pediatric emergency departments.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jun;155(6):665-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.6.665.
10
Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone.
Br Med J. 1974 Jun 22;2(5920):656-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验