Racicki Stephanie, Gerwin Sarah, Diclaudio Stacy, Reinmann Samuel, Donaldson Megan
Department of Physical Therapy, Walsh University, North Canton, OH, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):113-24. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000025.
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of conservative physical therapy management of cervicogenic headache (CGH).
CGH affects 22-25% of the adult population with females being four times more affected than men. CGHs are thought to arise from musculoskeletal impairments in the neck with symptoms most commonly consisting of suboccipital neck pain, dizziness, and lightheadedness. Currently, both invasive and non-invasive techniques are available to address these symptoms; however, the efficacy of non-invasive treatment techniques has yet to be established.
Computerized searches of CINAHL, ProQuest, PubMed, MEDLINE, and SportDiscus, were performed to obtain a qualitative analysis of the literature. Inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trial design, population diagnosed with CGH using the International Headache Society classification, at least one baseline measurement and one outcomes measure, and assessment of a conservative technique. Physiotherapy evidence-based database scale was utilized for quality assessment.
One computerized database search and two hand searches yielded six articles. Of the six included randomized controlled trials, all were considered to be of 'good quality' utilizing the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale. The interventions utilized were: therapist-driven cervical manipulation and mobilization, self-applied cervical mobilization, cervico-scapular strengthening, and therapist-driven cervical and thoracic manipulation. With the exception of one study, all reported reduction in pain and disability, as well as improvement in function.
Calculated effect sizes allowed comparison of intervention groups between studies. A combination of therapist-driven cervical manipulation and mobilization with cervico-scapular strengthening was most effective for decreasing pain outcomes in those with CGH.
本系统评价旨在评估保守物理治疗对颈源性头痛(CGH)的疗效。
CGH影响22%-25%的成年人群,女性受影响的几率是男性的四倍。CGH被认为源于颈部的肌肉骨骼损伤,症状最常见的包括枕下颈部疼痛、头晕和眩晕。目前,有创和无创技术均可用于缓解这些症状;然而,无创治疗技术的疗效尚未得到证实。
通过计算机检索CINAHL、ProQuest、PubMed、MEDLINE和SportDiscus,对文献进行定性分析。纳入标准为:随机对照试验设计、使用国际头痛协会分类法诊断为CGH的人群、至少一次基线测量和一次结局测量,以及对保守技术的评估。采用物理治疗循证数据库量表进行质量评估。
一次计算机数据库检索和两次手工检索共得到6篇文章。在纳入的6项随机对照试验中,根据物理治疗循证数据库量表,所有试验均被认为“质量良好”。所采用的干预措施包括:治疗师主导的颈椎手法治疗和松动术、自我应用的颈椎松动术、颈肩强化训练以及治疗师主导的颈椎和胸椎手法治疗。除一项研究外,所有研究均报告疼痛和功能障碍减轻,功能得到改善。
计算效应量有助于比较不同研究中的干预组。治疗师主导的颈椎手法治疗和松动术与颈肩强化训练相结合,对减轻CGH患者的疼痛效果最为显著。