Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(6):762-80. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2012-0225.
The aims of this paper are to explore the experiences of budget holders within the English National Health Service (NHS), in their attempts to implement programmes of disinvestment, and to consider factors which influence the success (or otherwise) of this activity.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Between 24 January and 15 March 2011 semi-structured, telephone interviews were conducted with representatives of 12 Primary Care Trusts in England. Interviews focussed on: understanding of the term "disinvestment"; current activities, and perceived determinants of successful disinvestment decision making and implementation. Data were organised into themes according to standard qualitative data coding practices.
Findings indicate that experiences of disinvestment are varied and that organisations are currently adopting a range of approaches. There are a number of apparently influential determinants of disinvestment which relate to both health system features and organisational characteristics. According to the experiences of the interviewees, many of the easier disinvestment options have now been taken and more ambitious plans, which require wider engagement and more thorough project management, will be required in the future.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Findings from the research suggest that issues around understanding and usage of disinvestment terminology should be addressed and that a more in-depth and ethnographic research agenda will be of most value in moving forward both the theory and practice of disinvestment.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This research suggests that, in the English NHS at least, there is a disjuncture between common usage of the term "disinvestment" and the way that it has previously been understood by the wider research community. In addition to this, the research also highlights a broader range of potential determinants of disinvestment than are considered in the extant literature.
本文旨在探讨英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中预算负责人在实施撤资计划时的经验,并考虑影响该活动成败的因素。
设计/方法/途径:2011 年 1 月 24 日至 3 月 15 日期间,对英格兰 12 家初级保健信托机构的代表进行了半结构化电话访谈。访谈重点关注:对“撤资”一词的理解;当前活动,以及成功的撤资决策和实施的感知决定因素。根据标准的定性数据编码实践,将数据组织成主题。
研究结果表明,撤资的经验各不相同,组织目前正在采用多种方法。有一些明显影响撤资的决定因素,涉及卫生系统特征和组织特征。根据受访者的经验,现在已经采取了许多更容易的撤资选择,未来将需要更具野心的计划,这些计划需要更广泛的参与和更彻底的项目管理。
研究局限性/影响:研究结果表明,应该解决理解和使用撤资术语方面的问题,并且更深入和民族志的研究议程将对推进撤资理论和实践最有价值。
原创性/价值:这项研究表明,在英国 NHS 中,至少存在术语“撤资”的常见用法与更广泛的研究界以前理解的用法之间的脱节。除此之外,该研究还突出了比现有文献中考虑的更广泛的撤资潜在决定因素。