Curtin University, Western Australia.
Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Nov;21(6):614-22. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12046. Epub 2013 May 6.
Public sector organisations are facing one of the most difficult financial periods in history and local decision-makers are tasked with making tough rationing decisions. Withdrawing or limiting services is an emotive and complex task and something the National Health Service has always found difficult. Over time, local authorities have gained significant experience in the closure of care homes - an equally complex and controversial issue. Drawing on local knowledge and best practice examples, this article highlights lessons and themes identified by those decommissioning care home services. We believe that such lessons are relevant to those making disinvestment decisions across public sector services, including health-care. The study employed semi-structured interviews with 12 Directors of Adult Social Services who had been highlighted nationally as having extensive experience of home closures. Interviews were conducted over a 2-week period in March 2011. Results from the study found that having local policy guidance that is perceived as fair and reasonable was advocated by those involved in home closures. Many local policies had evolved over time and had often been developed following experiences of home closures (both good and bad). Decisions to close care home services require a combination of strong leadership, clear strategic goals, a fair decision-making process, strong evidence of the need for change and good communication, alongside wider stakeholder engagement and support. The current financial challenge means that public sector organisations need to make tough choices on investment and disinvestment decisions. Any such decisions need to be influenced by what we know constitutes best practice. Sharing lessons and experiences within and between sectors could well inform and develop decision-making practices.
公共部门组织正面临着历史上最困难的财政时期之一,地方决策者面临着做出艰难的配给决策的任务。撤回或限制服务是一项情绪化和复杂的任务,也是国民保健制度一直以来感到困难的任务。随着时间的推移,地方当局在养老院关闭方面积累了丰富的经验——这同样是一个复杂且有争议的问题。本文借鉴地方知识和最佳实践案例,强调了那些取消养老院服务的人所确定的经验教训和主题。我们认为,这些经验教训与那些在包括医疗保健在内的公共部门服务中做出撤资决策的人有关。该研究采用了与 12 名成人社会服务主任的半结构化访谈,这些主任在全国范围内被认为具有广泛的养老院关闭经验。访谈在 2011 年 3 月进行了两周。研究结果发现,那些参与养老院关闭的人提倡制定被认为公平合理的地方政策指导。许多地方政策随着时间的推移而演变,并且往往是在养老院关闭的经验(好的和坏的)之后制定的。关闭养老院服务的决定需要强有力的领导、明确的战略目标、公平的决策过程、对变革必要性的有力证据以及良好的沟通,以及更广泛的利益相关者的参与和支持。当前的财政挑战意味着公共部门组织需要在投资和撤资决策方面做出艰难的选择。任何此类决策都需要受到最佳实践的影响。在部门内部和部门之间分享经验教训可以为决策实践提供信息和发展。