• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“重要的不是你做了什么,而是你怎么做”:从老年人服务退役中汲取医疗保健经验。

'It ain't what you do it's the way that you do it': lessons for health care from decommissioning of older people's services.

机构信息

Curtin University, Western Australia.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Nov;21(6):614-22. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12046. Epub 2013 May 6.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.12046
PMID:23647622
Abstract

Public sector organisations are facing one of the most difficult financial periods in history and local decision-makers are tasked with making tough rationing decisions. Withdrawing or limiting services is an emotive and complex task and something the National Health Service has always found difficult. Over time, local authorities have gained significant experience in the closure of care homes - an equally complex and controversial issue. Drawing on local knowledge and best practice examples, this article highlights lessons and themes identified by those decommissioning care home services. We believe that such lessons are relevant to those making disinvestment decisions across public sector services, including health-care. The study employed semi-structured interviews with 12 Directors of Adult Social Services who had been highlighted nationally as having extensive experience of home closures. Interviews were conducted over a 2-week period in March 2011. Results from the study found that having local policy guidance that is perceived as fair and reasonable was advocated by those involved in home closures. Many local policies had evolved over time and had often been developed following experiences of home closures (both good and bad). Decisions to close care home services require a combination of strong leadership, clear strategic goals, a fair decision-making process, strong evidence of the need for change and good communication, alongside wider stakeholder engagement and support. The current financial challenge means that public sector organisations need to make tough choices on investment and disinvestment decisions. Any such decisions need to be influenced by what we know constitutes best practice. Sharing lessons and experiences within and between sectors could well inform and develop decision-making practices.

摘要

公共部门组织正面临着历史上最困难的财政时期之一,地方决策者面临着做出艰难的配给决策的任务。撤回或限制服务是一项情绪化和复杂的任务,也是国民保健制度一直以来感到困难的任务。随着时间的推移,地方当局在养老院关闭方面积累了丰富的经验——这同样是一个复杂且有争议的问题。本文借鉴地方知识和最佳实践案例,强调了那些取消养老院服务的人所确定的经验教训和主题。我们认为,这些经验教训与那些在包括医疗保健在内的公共部门服务中做出撤资决策的人有关。该研究采用了与 12 名成人社会服务主任的半结构化访谈,这些主任在全国范围内被认为具有广泛的养老院关闭经验。访谈在 2011 年 3 月进行了两周。研究结果发现,那些参与养老院关闭的人提倡制定被认为公平合理的地方政策指导。许多地方政策随着时间的推移而演变,并且往往是在养老院关闭的经验(好的和坏的)之后制定的。关闭养老院服务的决定需要强有力的领导、明确的战略目标、公平的决策过程、对变革必要性的有力证据以及良好的沟通,以及更广泛的利益相关者的参与和支持。当前的财政挑战意味着公共部门组织需要在投资和撤资决策方面做出艰难的选择。任何此类决策都需要受到最佳实践的影响。在部门内部和部门之间分享经验教训可以为决策实践提供信息和发展。

相似文献

1
'It ain't what you do it's the way that you do it': lessons for health care from decommissioning of older people's services.“重要的不是你做了什么,而是你怎么做”:从老年人服务退役中汲取医疗保健经验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Nov;21(6):614-22. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12046. Epub 2013 May 6.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
4
5
[Relevance and financing of health services: a survey of physicians, students, patients, nursing personnel and seniors].[卫生服务的相关性与融资:对医生、学生、患者、护理人员及老年人的一项调查]
Gesundheitswesen. 2001 May;63(5):311-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-14212.
6
What older people want: evidence from a study of remote Scottish communities.老年人想要什么:来自对苏格兰偏远社区的一项研究的证据。
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1166. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
7
Perceived factors which shape decision-making around the time of residential care admission in older adults: a qualitative study.影响老年人入住养老院前后决策的感知因素:一项定性研究
Australas J Ageing. 2014 Mar;33(1):9-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2012.00644.x. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
8
Tackling disinvestment in health care services. The views of resource allocators in the English NHS.解决医疗服务投资不足问题。英国国民保健制度中资源分配者的观点。
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(6):762-80. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2012-0225.
9
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
10
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving our care home: A qualitative study of the views and experiences of residents, relatives and staff.养老院搬迁:居民、家属和工作人员的观点和体验的定性研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 Nov;17(6):e12466. doi: 10.1111/opn.12466. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
2
Conceptualising characteristics of resources withdrawal from medical services: a systematic qualitative synthesis.医疗服务资源撤离的特征概念化:一项系统性定性综合研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Oct 28;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00630-9.
3
Public perspectives on disinvestments in drug funding: results from a Canadian deliberative public engagement event on cancer drugs.
公众对药物投资减少的看法:加拿大癌症药物协商式公众参与活动的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):977. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7303-2.
4
Addressing overuse of health services in health systems: a critical interpretive synthesis.解决卫生系统中卫生服务利用过度问题:批判性综合分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jun 15;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0325-x.
5
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 11: reporting outcomes of an evidence-driven approach to disinvestment in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健可持续性(SHARE)11:报告在当地医疗环境中以循证方法进行撤资的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 30;18(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3172-0.
6
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 10: operationalising disinvestment in a conceptual framework for resource allocation.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健可持续性(SHARE)10:在资源分配概念框架中实施撤资
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2506-7.
7
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 9: conceptualising disinvestment in the local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健可持续性(SHARE)9:对当地医疗环境中的撤资进行概念化。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2507-6.
8
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 7: supporting staff in evidence-based decision-making, implementation and evaluation in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健可持续性(SHARE)7:在当地医疗环境中支持工作人员进行循证决策、实施和评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 21;17(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2388-8.
9
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 6: investigating methods to identify, prioritise, implement and evaluate disinvestment projects in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健可持续性(SHARE)6:研究在当地医疗环境中识别、确定优先次序、实施和评估撤资项目的方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 25;17(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2269-1.
10
Sustainability in health care by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 3: examining how resource allocation decisions are made, implemented and evaluated in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健的可持续性(SHARE)3:审视在当地医疗环境中资源分配决策是如何制定、实施和评估的。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 9;17(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2207-2.