• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缩小质量差距:重温科学现状(第6卷:预防医疗保健相关感染)

Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 6: prevention of healthcare-associated infections).

作者信息

Mauger Rothenberg Barbara, Marbella Anne, Pines Elizabeth, Chopra Ryan, Black Edgar R, Aronson Naomi

出版信息

Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Nov(208.6):1-578.

PMID:24422993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4781394/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To update the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence Report Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies: Volume 6-Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections on quality improvement (QI) strategies to increase adherence to preventive interventions and/or reduce infection rates for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), surgical site infections (SSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, and Embase® were searched from January 2006 to January 2012 for English-language studies with sample size ≥100 patients, a defined baseline period, and reported statistical analysis for adherence and/or infection rates. Articles from the previous report were screened and those meeting selection criteria were included.

REVIEW METHODS

We sought studies that evaluated the following QI strategies to improve adherence to evidence-based preventive interventions and/or reduce healthcare-associated infection (HAI) rates: audit and feedback; financial incentives, regulation, and policy; organizational change; patient education; provider education; and provider reminder systems. Data were abstracted by a single reviewer and fact-checked by a second. Outcomes were adherence to preventive interventions, infection rates, adverse outcomes, and cost savings. Study quality was assessed using relative rankings based on study design, adequacy of statistical analysis, length of followup, reporting and analysis of baseline and postintervention adherence and infection rates, and implementation of the intervention independent of other QI efforts. Combinations of QI strategies were assessed, not individual strategies. Strength of evidence was judged according to the AHRQ Methods Guide.

RESULTS

Sixty-one articles yielded 71 analyses at the infection level, including 9 articles (10 analyses) from the 2007 report, which evaluated the use of one or more QI strategies to improve adherence or infection rates and also controlled for confounding or secular trend. Twenty-six analyses were performed on CLABSI, 19 on VAP, 15 on SSI, and 11 on CAUTI. There were 34 analyses on adherence, of which 31 (91%) showed significant improvement. There were 63 analyses of infection rates, of which 42 (67%) showed significant improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate strength of evidence across all four infections that both adherence and infection rates improve when either audit and feedback plus provider reminder systems or audit and feedback alone is added to the base strategies of organizational change and provider education. There is low strength of evidence that adherence and infection rates improve when provider reminder systems alone are added to the base strategies. There was insufficient evidence for reduction of HAI in nonhospital settings, cost savings for QI strategies, and the nature and impact of the clinical contextual factors.

摘要

目标

更新医疗保健研究与质量机构(AHRQ)的《缩小质量差距:质量改进策略的批判性分析:第6卷——医疗保健相关感染的预防》,内容涉及提高对预防干预措施的依从性和/或降低中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)、呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)、手术部位感染(SSI)和导尿管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)感染率的质量改进(QI)策略。

数据来源

检索了2006年1月至2012年1月期间的MEDLINE®、CINAHL®和Embase®,以查找样本量≥100例患者、有明确基线期且报告了依从性和/或感染率统计分析的英文研究。对先前报告中的文章进行筛选,纳入符合选择标准的文章。

综述方法

我们寻找评估以下QI策略的研究,以提高对循证预防干预措施的依从性和/或降低医疗保健相关感染(HAI)率:审核与反馈;经济激励、监管和政策;组织变革;患者教育;提供者教育;以及提供者提醒系统。数据由一名审阅者提取,并由另一名审阅者进行核实。结果指标为对预防干预措施的依从性、感染率、不良后果和成本节约。根据研究设计、统计分析的充分性、随访时间、基线和干预后依从性及感染率的报告与分析,以及干预措施独立于其他QI工作的实施情况,使用相对排名评估研究质量。评估的是QI策略的组合,而非单个策略。根据AHRQ方法指南判断证据强度。

结果

61篇文章在感染层面产生了71项分析,其中包括2007年报告中的9篇文章(10项分析),这些文章评估了使用一种或多种QI策略来提高依从性或感染率,并对混杂因素或长期趋势进行了控制。对CLABSI进行了26项分析,对VAP进行了19项分析,对SSI进行了15项分析,对CAUTI进行了11项分析。有34项关于依从性的分析,其中31项(91%)显示有显著改善。有63项关于感染率的分析,其中42项(67%)显示有显著改善。

结论

在所有四种感染中,有中等强度的证据表明,当将审核与反馈加提供者提醒系统或仅审核与反馈添加到组织变革和提供者教育的基础策略中时,依从性和感染率都会提高。有低强度的证据表明,当仅将提供者提醒系统添加到基础策略中时,依从性和感染率会提高。对于非医院环境中HAI的降低、QI策略的成本节约以及临床背景因素的性质和影响,证据不足。

相似文献

1
Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 6: prevention of healthcare-associated infections).缩小质量差距:重温科学现状(第6卷:预防医疗保健相关感染)
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Nov(208.6):1-578.
2
3
Implementing quality improvement strategies to reduce healthcare-associated infections: A systematic review.实施质量改进策略以减少医疗相关感染:一项系统综述。
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Oct;42(10 Suppl):S274-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.05.031.
4
Interventions to improve professional adherence to guidelines for prevention of device-related infections.旨在提高专业人员对预防器械相关感染指南依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD006559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006559.pub2.
5
Nurse-driven quality improvement interventions to reduce hospital-acquired infection in the NICU.由护士主导的降低新生儿重症监护病房医院获得性感染的质量改进干预措施。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Jun;13(3):154-63; quiz 164-5. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318285fe70.
6
7
8
Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 3: quality improvement interventions to address health disparities).缩小质量差距:重新审视科学现状(第3卷:解决健康差异的质量改进干预措施)
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Aug(208.3):1-475.
9
Meta-analysis of the central line bundle for preventing catheter-related infections: a case study in appraising the evidence in quality improvement.中心静脉导管集束干预预防导管相关性感染的 Meta 分析:在质量改进中评价证据的案例研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Feb;25(2):118-29. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003787. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
Estimating the savings of a national project to prevent healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units.估算国家预防重症监护病房医源性感染项目的节省。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Jan;143:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduction of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection Through Focus on the Mesosystem: Standardization, Data, and Accountability.通过关注中观系统减少中心静脉导管相关血流感染:标准化、数据与问责制。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Mar 25;5(2):e272. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000272. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
2
Correlation of prevention practices with rates of health care-associated infection.预防措施与医疗保健相关感染率的相关性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;41(1):52-58. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.290. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
3
Implementation strategies for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的实施策略:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD011086. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011086.pub2.
4
Health care worker perspectives of their motivation to reduce health care-associated infections.医护人员对减少医源性感染的动机的看法。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Oct 1;45(10):1064-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
5
Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement Interventions for Bloodstream Infections Related to Central Catheters: A Systematic Review.经济评估与中心导管相关血流感染质量改进干预措施:系统评价。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1843-1854. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6610.
6
Evaluating the state of quality-improvement science through evidence synthesis: insights from the closing the quality gap series.通过证据综合评估质量改进科学的现状:来自《弥合质量差距》系列的见解
Perm J. 2013 Fall;17(4):52-61. doi: 10.7812/TPP/13-010. Epub 2013 Sep 13.