Suppr超能文献

低收入国家卫生系统的实施策略:系统评价综述

Implementation strategies for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.

作者信息

Pantoja Tomas, Opiyo Newton, Lewin Simon, Paulsen Elizabeth, Ciapponi Agustín, Wiysonge Charles S, Herrera Cristian A, Rada Gabriel, Peñaloza Blanca, Dudley Lilian, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Garcia Marti Sebastian, Oxman Andrew D

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Centro Medico San Joaquin, Vicuña Mackenna 4686, Macul, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD011086. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011086.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A key function of health systems is implementing interventions to improve health, but coverage of essential health interventions remains low in low-income countries. Implementing interventions can be challenging, particularly if it entails complex changes in clinical routines; in collaborative patterns among different healthcare providers and disciplines; in the behaviour of providers, patients or other stakeholders; or in the organisation of care. Decision-makers may use a range of strategies to implement health interventions, and these choices should be based on evidence of the strategies' effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the available evidence from up-to-date systematic reviews about the effects of implementation strategies for health systems in low-income countries. Secondary objectives include identifying needs and priorities for future evaluations and systematic reviews on alternative implementation strategies and informing refinements of the framework for implementation strategies presented in the overview.

METHODS

We searched Health Systems Evidence in November 2010 and PDQ-Evidence up to December 2016 for systematic reviews. We did not apply any date, language or publication status limitations in the searches. We included well-conducted systematic reviews of studies that assessed the effects of implementation strategies on professional practice and patient outcomes and that were published after April 2005. We excluded reviews with limitations important enough to compromise the reliability of the review findings. Two overview authors independently screened reviews, extracted data and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. We prepared SUPPORT Summaries for eligible reviews, including key messages, 'Summary of findings' tables (using GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence) and assessments of the relevance of findings to low-income countries.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 7272 systematic reviews and included 39 of them in this overview. An additional four reviews provided supplementary information. Of the 39 reviews, 32 had only minor limitations and 7 had important methodological limitations. Most studies in the reviews were from high-income countries. There were no studies from low-income countries in eight reviews.Implementation strategies addressed in the reviews were grouped into four categories - strategies targeting:1. healthcare organisations (e.g. strategies to change organisational culture; 1 review);2. healthcare workers by type of intervention (e.g. printed educational materials; 14 reviews);3. healthcare workers to address a specific problem (e.g. unnecessary antibiotic prescription; 9 reviews);4. healthcare recipients (e.g. medication adherence; 15 reviews).Overall, we found the following interventions to have desirable effects on at least one outcome with moderate- or high-certainty evidence and no moderate- or high-certainty evidence of undesirable effects.1.Strategies targeted at healthcare workers: educational meetings, nutrition training of health workers, educational outreach, practice facilitation, local opinion leaders, audit and feedback, and tailored interventions.2.Strategies targeted at healthcare workers for specific types of problems: training healthcare workers to be more patient-centred in clinical consultations, use of birth kits, strategies such as clinician education and patient education to reduce antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory care settings, and in-service neonatal emergency care training.3. Strategies targeted at healthcare recipients: mass media interventions to increase uptake of HIV testing; intensive self-management and adherence, intensive disease management programmes to improve health literacy; behavioural interventions and mobile phone text messages for adherence to antiretroviral therapy; a one time incentive to start or continue tuberculosis prophylaxis; default reminders for patients being treated for active tuberculosis; use of sectioned polythene bags for adherence to malaria medication; community-based health education, and reminders and recall strategies to increase vaccination uptake; interventions to increase uptake of cervical screening (invitations, education, counselling, access to health promotion nurse and intensive recruitment); health insurance information and application support.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Reliable systematic reviews have evaluated a wide range of strategies for implementing evidence-based interventions in low-income countries. Most of the available evidence is focused on strategies targeted at healthcare workers and healthcare recipients and relates to process-based outcomes. Evidence of the effects of strategies targeting healthcare organisations is scarce.

摘要

背景

卫生系统的一项关键功能是实施改善健康的干预措施,但在低收入国家,基本卫生干预措施的覆盖率仍然很低。实施干预措施可能具有挑战性,特别是如果这需要临床常规、不同医疗服务提供者和学科之间的协作模式、提供者、患者或其他利益相关者的行为或护理组织方面的复杂变化。决策者可能会使用一系列策略来实施卫生干预措施,而这些选择应基于这些策略有效性的证据。

目的

概述来自最新系统评价的关于低收入国家卫生系统实施策略效果的现有证据。次要目标包括确定未来对替代实施策略进行评价和系统评价的需求及优先事项,并为概述中提出的实施策略框架的完善提供信息。

方法

我们在2010年11月检索了卫生系统证据库,并检索了截至2016年12月的PDQ证据库以查找系统评价。检索时未应用任何日期、语言或出版状态限制。我们纳入了对评估实施策略对专业实践和患者结局影响的研究进行的高质量系统评价,这些评价发表于2005年4月之后。我们排除了存在足以损害评价结果可靠性的重要局限性的评价。两位概述作者独立筛选评价、提取数据并使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。我们为符合条件的评价编制了SUPPORT摘要,包括关键信息、“结果摘要”表(使用GRADE评估证据的确定性)以及对研究结果与低收入国家相关性的评估。

主要结果

我们识别出7272项系统评价,本概述纳入了其中39项。另有4项评价提供了补充信息。在这39项评价中,32项仅有轻微局限性,7项存在重要的方法学局限性。评价中的大多数研究来自高收入国家。8项评价中没有来自低收入国家的研究。评价中涉及的实施策略分为四类——针对:1. 医疗机构的策略(例如改变组织文化的策略;1项评价);2. 按干预类型划分的医护人员的策略(例如印刷教育材料;14项评价);3. 针对特定问题的医护人员的策略(例如不必要的抗生素处方;9项评价);4. 卫生服务接受者的策略(例如药物依从性;15项评价)。总体而言,我们发现以下干预措施对至少一项结局具有适度或高度确定性证据的期望效果,且没有适度或高度确定性证据表明存在不良效果。1. 针对医护人员的策略:教育会议、卫生工作者的营养培训、教育外展、实践促进、当地意见领袖、审核与反馈以及量身定制的干预措施。2. 针对特定类型问题的医护人员的策略:培训医护人员在临床咨询中更加以患者为中心、使用分娩包、诸如临床医生教育和患者教育等策略以减少门诊护理环境中的抗生素处方,以及在职新生儿急救护理培训。3. 针对卫生服务接受者的策略:大众媒体干预措施以增加艾滋病毒检测的接受度;强化自我管理和依从性、强化疾病管理计划以提高健康素养;行为干预措施和手机短信以促进抗逆转录病毒疗法的依从性;一次性激励措施以开始或继续结核病预防;对活动性结核病患者的默认提醒;使用分隔的聚乙烯袋以促进疟疾药物的依从性;社区健康教育,以及提醒和召回策略以增加疫苗接种率;增加子宫颈筛查接受度的干预措施(邀请、教育、咨询、获得健康促进护士服务和强化招募);健康保险信息和申请支持。

作者结论

可靠的系统评价评估了低收入国家实施循证干预措施的广泛策略。大多数现有证据集中在针对医护人员和卫生服务接受者的策略上,并且与基于过程的结局相关。针对医疗机构的策略效果的证据很少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f34/6483750/dee653d1753f/nCD011086-AFig-FIG01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验