Catholic University of Louvain, Saint-Luc University Hospital.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Jan 4;15(1):4332. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4332.
This study aimed to compare combined audio-visual coaching with audio coaching alone and assess their respective impact on the reproducibility of external breathing motion and, one step further, on the internal lung tumor motion itself, through successive sessions. Thirteen patients with NSCLC were enrolled in this study. The tumor motion was assessed by three to four successive 4D CT sessions, while the breathing signal was measured from magnetic sensors positioned on the epigastric region. For all sessions, the breathing was regularized with either audio coaching alone (AC, n = 5) or combined with a real-time visual feedback (A/VC, n = 8) when tolerated by the patients. Peak-to-peak amplitude, period and signal shape of both breathing and tumor motions were first measured. Then, the correlation between the respiratory signal and internal tumor motion over time was evaluated, as well as the residual tumor motion for a gated strategy. Although breathing and tumor motions were comparable between AC and AV/C groups, A/VC approach achieved better reproducibility through sessions than AC alone (mean tumor motion of 7.2 mm ± 1 vs. 8.6 mm ± 1.8 mm, and mean breathing motion of 14.9 mm ± 1.2 mm vs. 13.3mm ± 3.7 mm, respectively). High internal/external correlation reproducibility was achieved in the superior-inferior tumor motion direction for all patients. For the anterior posterior tumor motion direction, better correlation reproducibility has been observed when visual feedback has been used. For a displacement-based gating approach, A/VC might also be recommended, since it led to smaller residual tumor motion within clinically relevant duty cycles. This study suggests that combining real-time visual feedback with audio coaching might improve the reproducibility of key characteristics of the breathing pattern, and might thus be considered in the implementation of lung tumor radiotherapy.
本研究旨在比较联合视听指导与单纯音频指导,并通过连续的治疗阶段评估它们各自对外部呼吸运动的可重复性,以及更进一步地对内部肺肿瘤运动本身的影响。13 名 NSCLC 患者参与了这项研究。肿瘤运动通过三个至四个连续的 4DCT 阶段来评估,而呼吸信号则通过放置在上腹部的磁传感器来测量。对于所有的阶段,呼吸均通过单纯音频指导(AC,n = 5)或在患者可耐受的情况下结合实时视觉反馈(A/VC,n = 8)来进行规范化。首先测量了呼吸和肿瘤运动的峰峰值幅度、周期和信号形状。然后,评估了呼吸信号与内部肿瘤运动随时间的相关性,以及门控策略的残留肿瘤运动。尽管 AC 和 AV/C 组的呼吸和肿瘤运动相似,但 A/VC 方法在治疗阶段比单独使用 AC 具有更好的可重复性(平均肿瘤运动分别为 7.2mm ± 1 与 8.6mm ± 1.8mm,平均呼吸运动分别为 14.9mm ± 1.2mm 与 13.3mm ± 3.7mm)。在所有患者中,均在 superior-inferior 肿瘤运动方向上实现了高的内部/外部相关性可重复性。对于 anterior-posterior 肿瘤运动方向,当使用视觉反馈时,观察到更好的相关性可重复性。对于基于位移的门控方法,由于 A/VC 导致了更小的残留肿瘤运动,因此可能也被推荐使用。本研究表明,将实时视觉反馈与音频指导相结合可能会改善呼吸模式的关键特征的可重复性,因此可能会在肺肿瘤放疗的实施中被考虑。