ENT Department and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
ENT Department and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Special Care Dentistry, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sleep Med. 2014 Feb;15(2):269-72. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.11.781. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
Oral appliance therapy with a mandibular advancement device (OAm) can yield to complete therapeutic response (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI]<5 events/h), though some patients show little or no improvement in daytime sleepiness. The prevalence of residual excessive sleepiness (RES) despite effective treatment with OAm therapy is unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence of RES in patients treated with a titratable custom-made duobloc OAm.
A prevalence study was performed, collecting data from 185 patients with an established diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) under OAm therapy with a titratable custom-made duobloc device (baseline data were male:female ratio, 129:56; age, 48±9 years; body mass index [BMI], 27±4 kg/m2; Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] score, 10±5; and AHI, 19±12 events/h). A full-night polysomnography was performed at baseline and after 3 months of OAm therapy. Daytime sleepiness was assessed using the ESS with RES defined as an ESS score of 11 or higher out of 24, despite complete therapeutic response.
Out of 185 patients, 84 patients (45%) showed a complete therapeutic response with an AHI of <5 events per hour after 3 months of OAm therapy. Despite this normalization of AHI, 27 out of these 84 patients (32%) showed RES and had a significantly higher baseline ESS (15±4 vs. 9±4; P<.001) and were younger (43±9 vs. 47±9; P=.028) compared to patients without RES.
RES under OAm therapy showed a prevalence of up to 32% in SDB patients effectively treated with respect to AHI. Patients with RES were younger and had higher baseline daytime sleepiness.
使用下颌前伸装置(OAm)的口腔矫治器治疗可以达到完全治疗反应(呼吸暂停低通气指数[AHI]<5 次/小时),尽管有些患者白天嗜睡症状改善甚微或无改善。尽管 OAm 治疗有效,但仍存在残余过度嗜睡(RES)的患病率尚不清楚。我们旨在确定使用可调节定制双块 OAm 治疗的患者中 RES 的患病率。
进行了一项患病率研究,共收集了 185 名确诊为睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)的患者的数据,这些患者正在接受可调节定制双块 OAm 治疗(基线数据为男性:女性比例 129:56;年龄 48±9 岁;体重指数[BMI]27±4kg/m2;Epworth 嗜睡量表[ESS]评分 10±5;呼吸暂停低通气指数[AHI]19±12 次/小时)。在基线和 OAm 治疗 3 个月后进行了整夜多导睡眠图检查。白天嗜睡通过 ESS 评估,RES 定义为 ESS 评分≥11 分(满分 24 分),尽管 AHI 达到完全治疗反应。
在 185 名患者中,84 名患者(45%)在接受 OAm 治疗 3 个月后 AHI<5 次/小时,表现出完全治疗反应。尽管 AHI 正常化,但在这 84 名患者中,有 27 名(32%)患者出现 RES,且基线 ESS 显著更高(15±4 与 9±4;P<0.001),年龄更小(43±9 与 47±9;P=0.028)。
在有效治疗 AHI 的 SDB 患者中,OAm 治疗下的 RES 患病率高达 32%。有 RES 的患者年龄更小,基线白天嗜睡程度更高。