Department of Botany, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill., USA.
Theor Appl Genet. 1973 Jan;43(3-4):109-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00306559.
Among the offspring of crosses involving S male-sterile shrunken-2 inbred lines and their corresponding isogenic maintainer lines a number of exceptional male-fertile plants were identified. Some of these were plants with entirely fertile tassels but most were chimeras involving both sterile and fertile tassel elements. The majority of male-fertile exceptional plants, upon crossing with male-sterile testers, produced male-sterile test-cross progeny, indicating that the male-fertile trait is not pollen transmissible. However, there were four separate instances, involving three of the inbred lines, in which the crosses with S male-sterile testers produced male-fertile progeny, indicating that the newly arisen male-fertile trait is pollen transmissible. In three of these cases, the male fertility can be traced to a single plant in essentially male-sterile families. The fourth evidently involved a change in a maintainer plant whose progeny thereafter segregated for the ability to restore S sterile cytoplasm. In all cases, the results of progeny tests are consistent with the gametophytic pattern of restoration associated with S male-sterile cytoplasm.The male-fertile exceptions described here can be accounted for formally as mutations at one or more restorer gene loci in the nucleus. Taking account of the fact that mutations of restorer genes have not been reported previously in maize, and that four such changes were encountered in the same strains in which we have identified other male-fertile exceptions involving change in the cytoplasm, we have suggested a common basis for the two kinds of events. According to this scheme, given the first appearance, by whatever process, of the male-fertile element in sterile cytoplasm, it may become established and continue to propagate either in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus. In the former case, the change registers as cytoplasmic and the new strain has the characteristics of a maintainer which transmits the male-fertile trait through the egg, but not the sperm; in the latter case, the change occurs in the nucleus and the new strain, now behaving as a restorer, transmits male fertility through both egg and sperm.
在涉及 S 雄性不育皱缩-2 自交系及其相应同型保持系的杂交后代中,鉴定出了许多异常的雄性可育植株。其中一些是完全可育的雄穗,但大多数是涉及不育和可育雄穗元素的嵌合体。大多数雄性可育的异常植株,与雄性不育 tester 杂交后,产生了雄性不育测交后代,表明雄性可育性状不是花粉可传递的。然而,有四个独立的情况,涉及三个自交系,与 S 雄性不育 tester 的杂交产生了雄性可育的后代,表明新出现的雄性可育性状是花粉可传递的。在这三种情况下,雄性育性可以追溯到基本上雄性不育的家族中的单个植物。第四种情况显然涉及到一个保持系植物的变化,其后代此后分离出恢复 S 不育细胞质的能力。在所有情况下,后代测试的结果都与与 S 雄性不育细胞质相关的配子体恢复模式一致。这里描述的雄性可育异常可以正式解释为核中一个或多个恢复基因座的突变。考虑到以前在玉米中没有报道过恢复基因的突变,并且在我们已经确定涉及细胞质变化的其他雄性可育异常的相同品系中遇到了四个这样的变化,我们提出了这两种类型的事件的共同基础。根据这一方案,无论通过何种过程,雄性可育元素首次出现在不育细胞质中,它都可能在细胞质或细胞核中建立并继续繁殖。在前一种情况下,变化被记录为细胞质,新菌株具有保持系的特征,通过卵子传递雄性可育性状,但不通过精子;在后一种情况下,变化发生在细胞核中,新菌株现在表现为恢复系,通过卵子和精子传递雄性育性。