Poggio Claudio, Dagna Alberto, Chiesa Marco, Scribante Andrea, Beltrami Riccardo, Colombo Marco
Department of Endodontics, University of Pavia, Pavia - Italy.
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2014 Dec 30;12(3):256-62. doi: 10.5301/jabfm.5000161.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the cleaning efficacy of 2 different nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary systems: a new single system Reciproc compared with the rotary full sequence Mtwo. The amount of debris and the morphology of smear layer were the parameters for the evaluation of the cleanliness of root canals. The null hypothesis of the study was that there would be no significant difference in debris scores and smear layer scores between the 2 systems.
Forty single-rooted freshly extracted teeth were selected and divided into 2 groups. For each group, all root canals were shaped with 2 different NiTi instruments (Mtwo and Reciproc) and irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solutions by 3 trained operators. Specimens were fractured longitudinally and prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis at a standard magnification of ×5,000. The presence/absence of smear layer and the presence/absence of debris at the coronal, middle and apical third of each canal were evaluated using two 5-step scales for scores. Numeric data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U statistical tests, and significance was set at a P value <0.05.
This study revealed significant differences among the various groups. The Mtwo group presented significantly lower smear layer scores than the Reciproc group (P<0.01) in the middle and apical third of the canal.
Conventional continuous rotary NiTi instruments associated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA solutions seem to be better for obtaining clean dentinal canal walls. Reciprocating instruments leave a higher quantity of smear layer which covers dentinal walls and dentinal tubules.
本研究旨在调查两种不同的镍钛(NiTi)旋转系统的清洁效果:一种新型单支系统Reciproc与旋转全序列Mtwo进行比较。碎屑量和玷污层形态是评估根管清洁度的参数。本研究的无效假设是这两种系统在碎屑评分和玷污层评分上不会有显著差异。
选择40颗新鲜拔除的单根牙并分为两组。对于每组,所有根管均用两种不同的NiTi器械(Mtwo和Reciproc)进行预备,并由3名经过培训的操作人员用5.25%次氯酸钠和17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)溶液冲洗。标本纵向劈开,制备用于扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析,标准放大倍数为×5000。使用两个5级评分量表评估每个根管冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处玷污层的有无以及碎屑的有无。数值数据采用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U统计检验进行分析,显著性设定为P值<0.05。
本研究揭示了各组之间存在显著差异。在根管中部和根尖三分之一处,Mtwo组的玷污层评分显著低于Reciproc组(P<0.01)。
与5.25%次氯酸钠和17% EDTA溶液联合使用的传统连续旋转NiTi器械似乎更有利于获得清洁的牙本质根管壁。往复式器械会留下更多覆盖牙本质壁和牙本质小管的玷污层。