Suppr超能文献

使用镍钛旋转器械预备后根管壁的外观:一项扫描电子显微镜对比研究

Appearance of the root canal walls after preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.

作者信息

Prati Carlo, Foschi Federico, Nucci Cesare, Montebugnoli Lucio, Marchionni Silvia

机构信息

Endodontics Unit, Department of Dental Sciences, University of Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Via S. Vitale 59, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2004 Jun;8(2):102-10. doi: 10.1007/s00784-004-0253-8. Epub 2004 Feb 4.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, with scanning electron microscope (SEM), the appearance of root canal walls shaped by three different rotary NiTi techniques and one conventional manual technique in human extracted teeth. Four different instruments were used: K3, Hero 642, RaCe and K-file. Each sample was irrigated with 5 ml of 5% NaOCl and 5 ml of 3% H2O2 and EDTA, Rc-Prep (1 ml). Each sample was prepared for SEM observation and analyzed in the coronal, middle and apical third, comparing its aspect with a predefined scale of four different parameters: presence of smear layer, pulpal debris, inorganic debris and surface profile. The apical third showed significantly more pulpal and inorganic debris, smear layer and a high number of surface profile irregularities. No significant difference was found at the coronal, middle and apical thirds between manual and rotary techniques for inorganic debris, smear layer and surface profile. Much pulpal debris were found in the apical third for K3 and RaCe compared with Hero 642 and K-file. In conclusion, mechanical rotary techniques with NiTi instruments produced quite similar results compared with a conventional manual technique using K-files. The present study demonstrated that dentin and pulpal debris, the morphology of smear layer and surface profile were only partially influenced by the type of endodontic instruments. The apical third was the anatomical area with greater amount of debris and smear layer.

摘要

本研究的目的是在体外利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估三种不同的旋转镍钛器械技术和一种传统手动技术对人离体牙根管壁的塑形效果。使用了四种不同的器械:K3、Hero 642、RaCe和K锉。每个样本先用5 ml 5%的次氯酸钠、5 ml 3%的过氧化氢和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、Rc-Prep(1 ml)进行冲洗。每个样本均制备用于SEM观察,并在冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处进行分析,将其外观与四个不同参数的预定义量表进行比较:玷污层的存在、牙髓碎屑、无机碎屑和表面形态。根尖三分之一处显示出明显更多的牙髓和无机碎屑、玷污层以及大量的表面形态不规则。在冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处,手动技术和旋转技术在无机碎屑、玷污层和表面形态方面未发现显著差异。与Hero 642和K锉相比,K3和RaCe在根尖三分之一处发现了更多的牙髓碎屑。总之,与使用K锉的传统手动技术相比,镍钛器械的机械旋转技术产生的结果相当相似。本研究表明,牙本质和牙髓碎屑、玷污层的形态以及表面形态仅部分受牙髓治疗器械类型的影响。根尖三分之一是碎屑和玷污层含量较多的解剖区域。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验