Kirtane Milind V, Lall Abhineet, Chavan Kashmira, Satwalekar Dhruv
P D Hinduja Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Mahim, Mumbai, India.
P D Hinduja Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Mahim, Mumbai, India ; Kirtane Clinic, 1st Floor, Amar Bhuvan, French Bridge, Near Opera House, Mumbai, 400007 India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Aug;65(Suppl 2):236-41. doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0354-z. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
Multiple reports have demonstrated the efficacy of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). However the results of the same have varied from centre to centre. Many still regard external DCR as the gold standard. To describe an endoscopic DCR technique which anatomically simulates an external DCR and assess its results. Prospective, nonrandomized and noncomparative interventional case series. Clinical charts of patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction based on symptomatic, clinical and radiological basis were included in the study. All surgeries were done endonasally using standard operative technique. The modification in the standard technique included creating a wide exposure of the lacrimal sac, incising the sac and the suturing the medial wall of the lacrimal sac with the lateral nasal wall. The same was achieved by using either vascular clips or 5.0 vicryl sutures. Twenty (11 females and 9 males) were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 56.86 years old (range 27-85 years old). The main presenting symptom was epiphora and 1 patient with mucocele. Successful outcome was measured in terms of relief of sympto anatomical patency assessed by sac syringing and nasal endoscopy showing a wide patent lumen. A primary success rate of 95% and ultimate rate of 100% was achieved in the cases with a nasolacrimal duct (NLD) block while an overall success rate of 82.6% was noted when the cases with NLD block and common canalicular block were considered together. Endoscopic DCR can now easily replace external DCR as a standard. It is not only minimally invasive, but has minimal complications and using this technique, we have been able to achieve very high success rates.
多项报告已证实内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术(DCR)的疗效。然而,其结果在不同中心有所差异。许多人仍将外路DCR视为金标准。描述一种在解剖学上模拟外路DCR的内镜DCR技术,并评估其结果。前瞻性、非随机且非对照的介入性病例系列研究。基于症状、临床和影像学依据纳入鼻泪管阻塞患者的临床病历。所有手术均采用标准手术技术经鼻内进行。标准技术的改进包括广泛暴露泪囊、切开泪囊并将泪囊内侧壁与鼻外侧壁缝合。这可通过使用血管夹或5.0号薇乔缝线来实现。本研究纳入了20例患者(11例女性和9例男性)。患者的平均年龄为56.86岁(范围27 - 85岁)。主要表现症状为溢泪,1例患者伴有黏液囊肿。成功结局通过症状缓解来衡量,通过泪囊冲洗和鼻内镜检查评估解剖通畅情况,显示管腔广泛通畅。鼻泪管(NLD)阻塞病例的初始成功率为95%,最终成功率为100%,而将NLD阻塞和总泪小管阻塞病例一起考虑时,总体成功率为82.6%。内镜DCR现在可以轻松取代外路DCR成为标准术式它不仅微创,而且并发症极少,使用该技术,我们已能够取得非常高的成功率。