Hagberg Lars A, Brekke Hilde K, Bertz Fredrik, Winkvist Anna
Centre for Health Care Science, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden and Örebro University, P,O,Box 1324, SE-701 13 Örebro, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 15;14:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-38.
Overweight and obesity among young, adult women are increasing problems in Sweden as in many other countries. The postpartum period may be a good opportunity to improve eating habits and lose weight in a sustainable manner. The aim was to make a cost-utility analysis of a dietary behavior modification treatment alongside usual care, compared to usual care alone, among lactating overweight and obese women.
This study was a cost-utility analysis based on a randomized controlled and longitudinal clinical diet intervention. Between 2007-2010, 68 women living in Sweden were, after baseline measurement at 8-12 weeks postpartum, randomly assigned to a 12-week dietary behavior modification treatment or control group. Inclusion criteria were: self-reported pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) 25-35 kg/m2, non-smoker, singleton term delivery, birth weight > 2500 g, intention to breastfeed for 6 mo and no diseases (mother and child). The women in the intervention group received 1.5 hour of individual counseling at study start and 1 hour at follow-up home visits after 6 weeks of intervention, with support through cell phone text messages every two wk. Dietary intervention aimed to reduce dietary intake by 500 kcal/day. The control group received usual care. Weight results have previously been reported. Here we report on analyses carried out during 2012-2013 of cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY), based on the changes in quality of life measured by EQ-5D-3 L and SF-6D. Likelihood of cost-effectiveness was calculated using Net Monetary Benefit method.
Based on conservative assumptions of no remaining effect after 1 year follow-up, the diet intervention was cost-effective. Costs per gained QALY were 8 643 - 9 758 USD. The likelihood for cost-effectiveness, considering a willingness to pay 50 000 USD for a QALY, was 87-93%.
The diet intervention is cost-effective.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01343238 Registered April 27, 2011.The regional ethics committee in Gothenburg, Sweden, approved the study on November 15, 2006.
与许多其他国家一样,瑞典年轻成年女性的超重和肥胖问题日益严重。产后时期可能是改善饮食习惯并以可持续方式减肥的好时机。本研究旨在对哺乳期超重和肥胖女性进行饮食行为改变治疗并结合常规护理与单纯常规护理进行成本效益分析。
本研究是基于随机对照和纵向临床饮食干预的成本效益分析。2007年至2010年期间,68名居住在瑞典的女性在产后8至12周进行基线测量后,被随机分配到为期12周的饮食行为改变治疗组或对照组。纳入标准为:自我报告的孕前体重指数(BMI)为25 - 35kg/m²、非吸烟者、单胎足月分娩、出生体重>2500g、打算母乳喂养6个月且无疾病(母婴)。干预组女性在研究开始时接受1.5小时的个体咨询,干预6周后随访家访时接受1小时咨询,并每两周通过手机短信获得支持。饮食干预旨在使每日饮食摄入量减少500千卡。对照组接受常规护理。体重结果此前已报告。在此,我们报告基于EQ - 5D - 3L和SF - 6D测量的生活质量变化,于2012年至2013年进行的每质量调整生命年(QALY)成本分析。使用净货币效益法计算成本效益可能性。
基于1年随访后无残留效应的保守假设,饮食干预具有成本效益。每获得一个QALY的成本为8643 - 9758美元。考虑到为一个QALY支付50000美元的意愿,成本效益可能性为87% - 93%。
饮食干预具有成本效益。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01343238,于2011年4月2日注册。瑞典哥德堡地区伦理委员会于2006年11月15日批准了该研究。