• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Suspected appendicitis in pregnancy.

作者信息

Flexer S M, Tabib N, Peter M B

机构信息

Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of General Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD67RJ, United Kingdom.

Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of General Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD67RJ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2014 Apr;12(2):82-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.022. Epub 2014 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.022
PMID:24429161
Abstract

AIM

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute surgical presentations. However investigation and management is sometimes confounded in a pregnant patient. Appendicitis in pregnancy is often managed jointly by both the surgical and obstetric teams, which can lead to discrepant pathways, which may be detrimental to the patient. This review sets out to identify the normal physiological changes of pregnancy that pose diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties to the clinician, assess the more common differential diagnoses and review the current evidence to assist achieving a swift diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

METHODS

A literature review of the investigation and management of suspected appendicitis in pregnancy was undertaken. Guidelines by the relevant surgical, obstetric and radiological societies were also reviewed.

RESULTS

There remains no consensus on the best diagnostic pathway for appendicitis in pregnancy; which is unsurprising given that appendicitis in non-pregnant patients can yield diagnostic conundrums. However this review identifies a role for MRI scanning as a useful adjunct in these patients. The increasing role of laparoscopy in these patients is also becoming more apparent.

CONCLUSION

Appendicitis in pregnancy remains a complex problem necessitating a close working relationship between various specialties to achieve the best outcome for mother and fetus.

摘要

相似文献

1
Suspected appendicitis in pregnancy.
Surgeon. 2014 Apr;12(2):82-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.022. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
2
[Appendicitis and pregnancy. Seven case reports].[阑尾炎与妊娠。七例病例报告]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1996;25(4):411-5.
3
Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 4: Is magnetic resonance imaging useful for suspected appendicitis in pregnant patients?迈向循证急诊医学:来自曼彻斯特皇家医院的最佳临床证据。最佳临床证据4:磁共振成像对疑似阑尾炎的孕妇有用吗?
Emerg Med J. 2009 Jun;26(6):437. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.076224.
4
Acute appendicitis during pregnancy.
Tunis Med. 2001 Oct;79(10):521-5.
5
Evaluation of MRI for the diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy when ultrasound is inconclusive.当超声检查结果不明确时,评估磁共振成像(MRI)在孕期阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
J Surg Res. 2009 Sep;156(1):145-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.044. Epub 2009 May 3.
6
Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women.磁共振成像在疑似孕妇阑尾炎中的应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):345.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
7
Appendicitis in pregnancy: an ongoing diagnostic dilemma.妊娠期阑尾炎:持续存在的诊断难题。
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Feb;11(2):116-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01594.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
8
[Laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women].
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 1992 Feb(2):63-6.
9
[Appendicitis during pregnancy].[妊娠期阑尾炎]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1998 Mar;66:126-8.
10
Optimisation of the MR protocol in pregnant women with suspected acute appendicitis.疑似急性阑尾炎孕妇的磁共振协议优化。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):514-521. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5038-y. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnant patients requiring emergency general surgery: a scoping review of diagnostic and management strategies.需要急诊普通外科手术的孕妇:诊断和管理策略的范围综述
Can J Surg. 2025 May 29;68(3):E190-E213. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001124. Print 2025 May-Jun.
2
Appendicitis in pregnancy, higher rate of perforation compared to nonpregnant patients.妊娠期阑尾炎与非妊娠患者相比,穿孔率更高。
Case Rep Perinat Med. 2025 May 5;14(1):20240042. doi: 10.1515/crpm-2024-0042. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Evaluation of diagnostic value and Mendelian randomization study of appendicitis hub genes obtained by WGCNA analysis.
基于 WGCNA 分析的阑尾炎枢纽基因的诊断价值评估及孟德尔随机化研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 6;103(36):e39307. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039307.
4
Rectal ectopic pregnancy: A case report.直肠异位妊娠:一例病例报告。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Jun;119:109798. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109798. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Does one of the two most commonly used scoring systems have a decisive advantage over the other in diagnosing acute appendicitis in pregnant women?在诊断孕妇急性阑尾炎时,两种最常用的评分系统中的哪一种具有明显优势?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Apr 25;102(17):e33596. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033596.
6
Challenging Obstetrical Management in Generalized Peritonitis during Pregnancy.妊娠期弥漫性腹膜炎的挑战性产科处理
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr 21;2022:1249676. doi: 10.1155/2022/1249676. eCollection 2022.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.超声诊断妊娠期急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Emerg Radiol. 2022 Jun;29(3):437-448. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02021-9. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
8
Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosing acute appendicitis during pregnancy based on surgical findings.基于手术结果评估超声检查在诊断妊娠期急性阑尾炎中的准确性。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Aug 29;31:48. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.48. eCollection 2017.
9
The Alvarado Score is accurate in pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.Alvarado 评分在妊娠中准确:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Jun;45(3):411-416. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0855-x. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
10
Acute appendicitis in pregnancy: Case series and review.妊娠期急性阑尾炎:病例系列报道及综述
North Clin Istanb. 2015 Oct 4;3(1):60-63. doi: 10.14744/nci.2015.96530. eCollection 2016.