Skelhorne-Gross Graham, Walker Melissa, Rajendran Luckshi, Hamad Doulia, Nantais Jordan, Bischof Danielle A, Nadler Ashlie
From the Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Skelhorne-Gross, Rajendran, Hamad, Bischof, Nadler); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Walker); the Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. (Nantais); Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Bischof); Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Nadler).
Can J Surg. 2025 May 29;68(3):E190-E213. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001124. Print 2025 May-Jun.
BACKGROUND: About 1%-2% of pregnant patients develop conditions that require emergency general surgery (EGS). The diagnosis and management of these conditions can be challenging, as surgeons must carefully balance the needs of the pregnant patient and the developing fetus. We sought to summarize the latest literature guiding surgical management of appendicitis, benign biliary disease, bowel obstruction, and hemorrhoids in pregnant patients. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive scoping review using OVID Medline for articles published between January 2000 and June 2023 pertaining to EGS and pregnancy. RESULTS: Acute appendicitis, benign biliary disease, and bowel obstructions confer increased risk of adverse maternal and fetal obstetrical outcomes. In general, pregnant patients with acute appendicitis and cholecystitis should undergo appendectomy or cholecystectomy, respectively. The management of biliary colic has significant nuance depending on trimester. While an operative approach is favoured in the first 2 trimesters, the role of surgery in the third trimester is less clear. Nonoperative treatment of each of these diseases can result in significant maternal, and possibly fetal, morbidity. Operative management of bowel obstruction must be determined on a case-by-case basis. In all instances, a laparoscopic approach is preferred, if feasible. CONCLUSION: A thoughtful approach is crucial for surgeons and institutions caring for pregnant patients with EGS diseases. Treatment should be similar to that in nonpregnant patients, with some important considerations and modifications. Nonoperative or delayed operative management often increases adverse obstetrical events, including death.
背景:约1%-2%的孕妇会出现需要急诊普通外科手术(EGS)的情况。这些情况的诊断和处理具有挑战性,因为外科医生必须谨慎平衡孕妇和发育中胎儿的需求。我们试图总结指导孕妇阑尾炎、良性胆道疾病、肠梗阻和痔疮手术治疗的最新文献。 方法:我们使用OVID Medline对2000年1月至2023年6月发表的有关EGS和妊娠的文章进行了全面的范围综述。 结果:急性阑尾炎、良性胆道疾病和肠梗阻会增加母婴不良产科结局的风险。一般来说,患有急性阑尾炎和胆囊炎的孕妇应分别接受阑尾切除术或胆囊切除术。胆绞痛的处理根据孕期有显著差异。虽然在前两个孕期倾向于手术治疗,但手术在第三个孕期的作用尚不清楚。这些疾病的非手术治疗都可能导致严重的母体,甚至可能是胎儿发病。肠梗阻的手术治疗必须根据具体情况确定。在所有情况下,若可行,首选腹腔镜手术。 结论:对于照顾患有EGS疾病孕妇的外科医生和机构来说,深思熟虑的方法至关重要。治疗应与非孕妇相似,但有一些重要的考虑因素和调整。非手术或延迟手术治疗往往会增加不良产科事件,包括死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-1-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010-3-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-16
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-11-27
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2024-11
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023-12
Ann Ital Chir. 2023
Isr Med Assoc J. 2023-5
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023-4