Ethics Advisory Group, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France; Victorian Infectious Disease Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Health and Human Rights Division, Human Rights Watch, New York, New York, USA.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014 Feb;18(2):155-9. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0609.
Policies involving the use of involuntary incarceration for tuberculosis (TB) are highly ethically controversial. To encourage ethical reflection within the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), the Ethics Advisory Group (EAG) surveyed members regarding their attitudes and values relating to involuntary incarceration for TB.
Members of the Union TB section were invited to respond to an anonymous web-based survey. The survey included both multiple choice questions describing a range of scenarios regarding involuntary incarceration, and free-text fields inviting respondents to provide general comments on ethical issues.
The survey was completed by 194 participants, 33 (17%) of whom were opposed to involuntary incarceration on principle. The age and sex of the respondents was not associated with likelihood of principled opposition; respondents from North America were least likely to be opposed to involuntary incarceration (P = 0.02). Respondents were most likely to consider involuntary incarceration for persons with known multidrug-resistant TB or a history of previous treatment default, and least likely where people lived alone, were university-educated or the main income provider for their families.
This survey found a wide range of viewpoints regarding involuntary incarceration, and highlights a number of key elements in ethical engagement with the tensions surrounding involuntary incarceration. We provide commentary on approaches to ethical policy making in the light of these findings.
涉及对结核病(TB)患者实施非自愿监禁的政策极具伦理争议。为了鼓励国际防痨和肺病联合会(联合会)内部进行伦理反思,伦理咨询小组(EAG)对成员就与 TB 非自愿监禁相关的态度和价值观进行了调查。
邀请联合会结核病科成员回答匿名网络调查。该调查包括了一系列描述非自愿监禁情况的多项选择题,以及邀请受访者提供有关伦理问题的一般意见的自由文本字段。
共有 194 名参与者完成了调查,其中 33 人(17%)原则上反对非自愿监禁。受访者的年龄和性别与是否反对非自愿监禁无关;来自北美的受访者最不可能反对非自愿监禁(P = 0.02)。受访者最有可能考虑对已知耐多药结核病或有既往治疗违约史的人实施非自愿监禁,而对独居、受过大学教育或是家庭主要收入来源的人则最不可能实施非自愿监禁。
本调查发现了对非自愿监禁的广泛观点,并强调了在处理围绕非自愿监禁的紧张局势时进行伦理接触的一些关键要素。我们根据这些发现对伦理政策制定方法提供了评论。