Suppr超能文献

对结核病强制隔离的态度:对工会成员的调查。

Attitudes towards involuntary incarceration for tuberculosis: a survey of Union members.

机构信息

Ethics Advisory Group, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France; Victorian Infectious Disease Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Health and Human Rights Division, Human Rights Watch, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014 Feb;18(2):155-9. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0609.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policies involving the use of involuntary incarceration for tuberculosis (TB) are highly ethically controversial. To encourage ethical reflection within the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), the Ethics Advisory Group (EAG) surveyed members regarding their attitudes and values relating to involuntary incarceration for TB.

METHODS

Members of the Union TB section were invited to respond to an anonymous web-based survey. The survey included both multiple choice questions describing a range of scenarios regarding involuntary incarceration, and free-text fields inviting respondents to provide general comments on ethical issues.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 194 participants, 33 (17%) of whom were opposed to involuntary incarceration on principle. The age and sex of the respondents was not associated with likelihood of principled opposition; respondents from North America were least likely to be opposed to involuntary incarceration (P = 0.02). Respondents were most likely to consider involuntary incarceration for persons with known multidrug-resistant TB or a history of previous treatment default, and least likely where people lived alone, were university-educated or the main income provider for their families.

CONCLUSION

This survey found a wide range of viewpoints regarding involuntary incarceration, and highlights a number of key elements in ethical engagement with the tensions surrounding involuntary incarceration. We provide commentary on approaches to ethical policy making in the light of these findings.

摘要

背景

涉及对结核病(TB)患者实施非自愿监禁的政策极具伦理争议。为了鼓励国际防痨和肺病联合会(联合会)内部进行伦理反思,伦理咨询小组(EAG)对成员就与 TB 非自愿监禁相关的态度和价值观进行了调查。

方法

邀请联合会结核病科成员回答匿名网络调查。该调查包括了一系列描述非自愿监禁情况的多项选择题,以及邀请受访者提供有关伦理问题的一般意见的自由文本字段。

结果

共有 194 名参与者完成了调查,其中 33 人(17%)原则上反对非自愿监禁。受访者的年龄和性别与是否反对非自愿监禁无关;来自北美的受访者最不可能反对非自愿监禁(P = 0.02)。受访者最有可能考虑对已知耐多药结核病或有既往治疗违约史的人实施非自愿监禁,而对独居、受过大学教育或是家庭主要收入来源的人则最不可能实施非自愿监禁。

结论

本调查发现了对非自愿监禁的广泛观点,并强调了在处理围绕非自愿监禁的紧张局势时进行伦理接触的一些关键要素。我们根据这些发现对伦理政策制定方法提供了评论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验