Suppr超能文献

使用主动脉抢救性血管内球囊阻断在一种高度致命性的非压迫性躯干出血模型中。

Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a highly lethal model of noncompressible torso hemorrhage.

机构信息

*The Academic Department of Military Surgery & Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham; †Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom; ‡The US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston; §59th Medical Wing, Lackland Air Force Base; ∥Department of Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas; and ¶The Norman M. Rich Department of Surgery, The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Shock. 2014 Feb;41(2):130-7. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000085.

Abstract

Noncompressible torso hemorrhage is a leading cause of death in trauma, with many patients dying before definitive hemorrhage control. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an adjunct than can be used to expand the window of salvage in patients with end-stage hemorrhagic shock. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of continuous and intermittent REBOA (iREBOA) on mortality using a highly lethal porcine model of noncompressible torso hemorrhage. Male splenectomized pigs (70-90 kg) underwent a laparoscopic liver injury (80% resection of left lobe) followed by a 10-min free-bleed period. Animals were then divided into three groups (n = 8) for a 60-min intervention phase (n = 8): continuous occlusion (cREBOA), iREBOA, or no occlusion (nREBOA). Groups then underwent whole blood resuscitation, damage control surgery, and further critical care. Endpoints were mortality and hemodynamic and circulating measures of shock and resuscitation. Systolic blood pressure (in mmHg) at the end of the free-bleed period for cREBOA, iREBOA, and nREBOA was 31 ± 14, 48 ± 28, and 28 ± 17, respectively (P = 0.125). Following the start of the intervention phase, systolic blood pressure was higher in the iREBOA and cREBOA groups compared with the nREBOA (85 ± 37 and 96 ± 20 vs. 42 ± 4; P < 0.001). Overall mortality for the cREBOA, iREBOA, and nREBOA groups was 25.0%, 37.5%, and 100.0% (P = 0.001). Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta can temporize exsanguinating hemorrhage and restore life-sustaining perfusion, bridging critical physiology to definitive hemorrhage control. Prospective observational studies of REBOA as a hemorrhage control adjunct should be undertaken in appropriate groups of human trauma patients.

摘要

非压迫性胸腹部出血是创伤导致死亡的主要原因,许多患者在明确控制出血之前就已经死亡。主动脉球囊阻断复苏术(REBOA)是一种辅助手段,可以在终末期出血性休克患者中扩大抢救时间窗。本研究旨在使用一种非压迫性胸腹部出血的高度致命性猪模型,评估持续和间歇性 REBOA(iREBOA)对死亡率的影响。雄性脾切除猪(70-90 公斤)接受腹腔镜肝损伤(左叶 80%切除),然后进行 10 分钟自由出血期。然后,动物被分为三组(每组 8 只)进行 60 分钟干预期(每组 8 只):持续阻断(cREBOA)、iREBOA 或不阻断(nREBOA)。各组随后进行全血复苏、损伤控制性手术和进一步的重症监护。终点是死亡率以及休克和复苏的血流动力学和循环测量。cREBOA、iREBOA 和 nREBOA 的自由出血期结束时的收缩压(mmHg)分别为 31 ± 14、48 ± 28 和 28 ± 17(P = 0.125)。干预阶段开始后,iREBOA 和 cREBOA 组的收缩压高于 nREBOA(85 ± 37 和 96 ± 20 与 42 ± 4;P < 0.001)。cREBOA、iREBOA 和 nREBOA 组的总死亡率分别为 25.0%、37.5%和 100.0%(P = 0.001)。主动脉球囊阻断复苏术可暂时控制出血性休克并恢复维持生命的灌注,将关键生理状态过渡到明确的出血控制。应在适当的人类创伤患者群体中进行 REBOA 作为出血控制辅助手段的前瞻性观察研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验