Anitha K V, Dhanraj M, Haribabu R
Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, India ; Flat F-1 76/110 Bajanai Koil Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai, India.
Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sep;13(3):296-302. doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0267-5. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
The exact replication of natural tooth color in a metal ceramic restoration is a challenging fact as its affected by enumerable factors. Research revealing the influence of base metal alloys with different porcelain systems on the color of the restorations have shown minimal interest. The aim of the study was to evaluate the optical influence of different alloys (mainly base metal) and ceramic systems affecting the final color of metal-ceramic restorations. Four commercial ceramic alloys, two Ni-Cr, one Co-Cr and a high-noble alloy were combined with two porcelains in metal-ceramic specimens with a standardized thickness of layers. Ten disc-shaped specimens were prepared for each alloy/porcelain combination. High-noble was used as control group. Only opaque and dentin layers were applied. The specimens were analysed with Spectrophotometer, and data were obtained in the CIELAB color system. The recorded data were analysed with a one-way ANOVA and multiple range test by tukey-HSD procedure to identify the significant groups at 5 % level. The final color of the metal-ceramic specimens were significantly affected by both type of the alloy and the porcelain systems used (P < 0.0001). The Co-Cr alloy-porcelain combination produced least color difference when compared with the high-noble control group. There was significant difference (P < 0.0001) between both the brands of Ni-Cr alloy-porcelain systems. For all the alloy-porcelain combinations VMK 95 porcelain showed minimum color difference compared to the d-SIGN porcelain group.
The final color of metal ceramic specimens was influenced both from the type of base metal alloy substructure and from the type of overlying porcelain.
在金属陶瓷修复体中精确复制天然牙齿颜色是一项具有挑战性的工作,因为它受到众多因素的影响。关于不同贱金属合金与瓷系统对修复体颜色影响的研究兴趣不大。本研究的目的是评估不同合金(主要是贱金属)和陶瓷系统对金属陶瓷修复体最终颜色的光学影响。将四种商用陶瓷合金,两种镍铬合金、一种钴铬合金和一种高贵金属合金与两种瓷结合,制成具有标准化层厚度的金属陶瓷试件。每种合金/瓷组合制备十个圆盘形试件。以高贵金属合金作为对照组。仅应用不透明层和牙本质层。用分光光度计对试件进行分析,并在CIELAB颜色系统中获取数据。对记录的数据进行单因素方差分析,并采用tukey-HSD程序进行多重范围检验,以确定5%水平下的显著组。金属陶瓷试件的最终颜色受到合金类型和所用瓷系统的显著影响(P<0.0001)。与高贵金属对照组相比,钴铬合金-瓷组合产生的颜色差异最小。两种镍铬合金-瓷系统品牌之间存在显著差异(P<0.0001)。对于所有合金-瓷组合,与d-SIGN瓷组相比,VMK 95瓷的颜色差异最小。
金属陶瓷试件的最终颜色受贱金属合金底层结构类型和覆盖瓷类型的影响。