Suppr超能文献

女性割礼的女性观点:Q 方法学。

Women's perspectives of female genital cutting: Q-methodology.

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2014 Jan 17;14:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding women's perspectives of female genital cutting is particularly critical for understanding the roots of the problem and enhancing effectiveness of any prevention program. Very limited research has examined how people in Iraqi Kurdistan Region think about this practice. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of women of female genital cutting with the aim of uncovering discrepancies and commonalities between women of different socio-educational groups.

METHODS

An explorative study using Q-methodology was conducted with 29 women from different educational and socio-economic statuses in Erbil, the main city of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. Participants were asked to rank-order a set of 39 statements about different aspects of female genital cutting into a distribution on a scale of nine from "disagree most" to "agree most". By-person factor analysis was performed with factors or latent viewpoints extracted through centroid method and varimax rotation.

RESULTS

A four-factor solution and one consensus perspective provided the best conceptual fit for the women's perspectives about female genital cutting. Factor 1, entitled "positive cultural tradition", centers on recognizing female genital cutting as a positive cultural aspect and an essential part of the Kurdish culture. Factor 2, "active opponents", positions around actively opposing the practice of female genital cutting and considering the practice a violation of human rights. Factor 3, "role of law", stresses the importance of developing and enforcing law for combating female genital cutting. Factor 4, "health concerns and passive opposition", represents the perspectives of recognizing the importance of health concerns resulting from female genital cutting and opposition of the practice but not in an active manner. A consensus perspective, "marital role", centers primarily on lack of effect of female genital cutting on women's marital role.

CONCLUSIONS

Female genital cutting is still a contentious issue among women in Iraqi Kurdistan Region. By identifying disagreement and consensus among women, four different perspectives on female genital cutting were uncovered with having perspectives at both extremes of accepting the practice and actively opposing it. The study highlighted the typical characterizations that are associated with each perspective.

摘要

背景

了解女性对女性生殖器切割的看法对于理解问题的根源和增强任何预防计划的有效性尤为重要。非常有限的研究探讨了伊拉克库尔德地区的人们如何看待这种做法。本研究旨在探讨女性对女性生殖器切割的看法,旨在揭示不同社会教育群体的女性之间的差异和共同点。

方法

在伊拉克库尔德地区的主要城市埃尔比勒,对 29 名来自不同教育和社会经济地位的女性进行了一项探索性研究,使用 Q 方法学。参与者被要求对一套 39 个关于女性生殖器切割不同方面的陈述进行排序,在从“最不同意”到“最同意”的九级量表上进行分配。通过个人因素分析,通过质心法和方差极大旋转提取因素或潜在观点。

结果

四因素解决方案和一个共识观点为女性对女性生殖器切割的看法提供了最佳的概念契合度。第一个因素,称为“积极的文化传统”,集中在认识到女性生殖器切割是一种积极的文化方面,是库尔德文化的重要组成部分。第二个因素,“积极反对者”,围绕着积极反对女性生殖器切割的做法,并认为这种做法侵犯了人权。第三个因素,“法律作用”,强调制定和执行打击女性生殖器切割的法律的重要性。第四个因素,“健康关注和被动反对”,代表了认识到女性生殖器切割带来的健康问题的重要性以及对这种做法的反对,但不是以积极的方式。一个共识观点,“婚姻角色”,主要集中在女性生殖器切割对女性婚姻角色的影响不大。

结论

女性生殖器切割在伊拉克库尔德地区的女性中仍然是一个有争议的问题。通过确定女性之间的分歧和共识,揭示了对女性生殖器切割的四种不同看法,其中包括接受和积极反对该做法的极端观点。该研究强调了与每种观点相关的典型特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/3898223/71993fc9556a/1472-6874-14-11-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验