Suppr超能文献

用于空气过敏原的舌下免疫疗法:美国现状

Sublingual immunotherapy for aeroallergens: status in the United States.

作者信息

Cox Linda

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):34-42. doi: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3708.

Abstract

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been used in the treatment of allergic disease for nearly 30 years and is prescribed at least as frequently as subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Several large U.S. clinical trials using single allergen tablets (grass and ragweed) or extract solution (ragweed) have met their primary clinical efficacy outcome. In December, 2013 the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) Allergenic Products Advisory Committee favorably reviewed two grass tablet product formulations; the FDA usually follows the recommendations of their advisory committees. Industry-sponsored and investigator-initiated aeroallergen SLIT clinical trials conducted in the United States are the focus of this article. To provide a basis for evaluation of this treatment, SLIT mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, efficacy as reported in systematic reviews, and safety are also discussed. Practical considerations of SLIT in the clinical setting are reviewed. These include patient instructions and adherence, which appear to be as poor as SCIT. Estimated treatment costs based on U.S.-licensed allergen extract manufacturers' list prices and doses reported to be effective in studies using U.S.-licensed allergen extracts or the allergen immunotherapy practice parameters are presented. Unmet needs, which include unknown effective dose for many allergen extracts, optimal schedule (daily versus other) and timing of treatment initiation (perennial versus precoseasonal, ≥8 weeks before or just at the start of season), and whether epinephrine autoinjectors should be routinely prescribed for SLIT patients are discussed.

摘要

舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)已用于治疗过敏性疾病近30年,其处方频率至少与皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)相同。美国几项使用单一过敏原片剂(草和豚草)或提取液(豚草)的大型临床试验均达到了其主要临床疗效结果。2013年12月,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)变应原产品咨询委员会对两种草片剂产品配方进行了有利审查;FDA通常遵循其咨询委员会的建议。本文重点关注在美国开展的由行业赞助和研究者发起的气传变应原舌下免疫疗法临床试验。为评估这种治疗方法提供依据,还讨论了舌下免疫疗法的机制、药代动力学、系统评价中报告的疗效以及安全性。回顾了临床环境中舌下免疫疗法的实际考虑因素。这些因素包括患者指导和依从性,其情况似乎与皮下免疫疗法一样差。根据美国许可的变应原提取物制造商的标价以及在使用美国许可的变应原提取物或变应原免疫疗法实践参数的研究中报告的有效剂量,给出了估计的治疗费用。讨论了尚未满足的需求,包括许多变应原提取物的有效剂量未知、最佳给药方案(每日给药与其他方案)以及治疗开始时间(常年性与季前性,季节开始前≥8周或刚好在季节开始时),以及是否应为舌下免疫疗法患者常规开具肾上腺素自动注射器。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验