• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support (Impella) in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure and/or Cardiogenic Shock Not Eligible to PROTECT II Trial.晚期心力衰竭和/或心源性休克患者中不符合PROTECT II试验条件的经皮血流动力学支持(Impella)
Int J Angiol. 2013 Dec;22(4):207-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349167.
2
Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology.经皮跨瓣微轴流泵支持在心脏病学中的应用。
Circulation. 2022 Apr 19;145(16):1254-1284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
3
Use of impella ventricular assist device in patients with severe coronary artery disease presenting with cardiac arrest.在出现心脏骤停的严重冠状动脉疾病患者中使用Impella心室辅助装置。
Int J Angiol. 2012 Sep;21(3):163-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1324736.
4
Outcome of Impella 2.5 use in patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Henan, China: a case series.
Perfusion. 2023 Jan;38(1):208-213. doi: 10.1177/02676591211049018. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
5
A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience.一项前瞻性可行性研究,调查在接受高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PROTECT I 试验)的患者中使用 Impella 2.5 系统的情况:美国初步经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.11.005.
6
Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.早期经皮 Impella 辅助治疗急性心肌梗死后并发心原性休克伴心脏骤停可改善短期和长期生存率。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;49(6):943-955. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004915.
7
Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.在一家没有现场手术支持的农村社区医院,使用Impella进行血流动力学支持治疗急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的结果。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Feb;31(2):E23-E29. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00252.
8
Prophylactic use of intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: will the Impella LP 2.5 device show superiority in a clinical randomized study?主动脉内球囊反搏在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的预防性应用:在临床随机研究中,Impella LP 2.5装置会显示出优越性吗?
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010 Apr-Jun;11(2):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.07.006.
9
Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心源性休克患者使用经皮左心室辅助装置的性别差异:来自经皮心室辅助装置工作组
Indian Heart J. 2018 Jul;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Health Technology Assessment.经皮心室辅助装置:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 Feb 7;17(2):1-97. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock.用于急性心源性休克的机械辅助装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD013002. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013002.pub2.
2
[Coronary artery disease : Interventional and operative therapeutic options after cardiac arrest].[冠状动脉疾病:心脏骤停后的介入及手术治疗选择]
Herz. 2017 Apr;42(2):138-150. doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4546-5.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study.一项前瞻性、随机临床试验,比较在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中使用 Impella 2.5 与主动脉内球囊泵进行血流动力学支持:PROTECT II 研究。
Circulation. 2012 Oct 2;126(14):1717-27. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098194. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
2
Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the USpella Registry.真实世界中使用 Impella 2.5 循环支持系统进行复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:美国 Impella 注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov 1;80(5):717-25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23403. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
3
Cardiogenic shock secondary to severe acute ischemic mitral regurgitation managed with an Impella 2.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device.因严重急性缺血性二尖瓣反流导致的心源性休克,采用 Impella 2.5 经皮左心室辅助装置治疗。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun 1;79(7):1129-34. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23271. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
4
The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: the Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience.对于出现严重和深度心原性休克的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者,使用 Impella 2.5 和 5.0 设备:学术医疗中心重症监护病房的经验。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):2072-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821e89b5.
5
Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;12(5):299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
6
Left ventricular mechanical support with Impella provides more ventricular unloading in heart failure than extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.左心室机械辅助Impella 在心衰中的心室卸载作用优于体外膜肺氧合。
ASAIO J. 2011 May-Jun;57(3):169-76. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31820e121c.
7
The Impella Recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.Impella Recover 2.5 与 TandemHeart 心室辅助装置在接受高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中是安全的,并与相当的临床结果相关联。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul 1;82(1):E28-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22929. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
8
Comparative outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients managed with Impella microaxial pump or extracorporeal life support.比较使用 Impella 微轴流泵或体外生命支持治疗心源性休克患者的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jul;142(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.075. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
9
High-risk PCI in acute coronary syndromes with Impella LP 2.5 device support.经 Impella LP 2.5 装置支持的急性冠脉综合征高危 PCI。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 17;153(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.039. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
10
First experience with the Impella Recover(R) LP 2.5 micro axial pump in patients with cardiogenic shock or undergoing high-risk revascularisation.
EuroIntervention. 2006 May;2(1):84-90.

晚期心力衰竭和/或心源性休克患者中不符合PROTECT II试验条件的经皮血流动力学支持(Impella)

Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support (Impella) in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure and/or Cardiogenic Shock Not Eligible to PROTECT II Trial.

作者信息

Liu Wei, Mukku Venkata Kishore, Gilani Syed, Fujise Ken, Barbagelata Alejandro

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.

出版信息

Int J Angiol. 2013 Dec;22(4):207-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349167.

DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1349167
PMID:24436614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3830570/
Abstract

PROTECT I and II trials have tested the efficacy of Impella in patents with high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, patients with severe hemodynamic instability such as cardiac arrest, ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), or cardiogenic shock were excluded. The objective was to investigate the efficacy of Impella in sicker patient population who were not included in PROTECT trials. These patients merit high-risk PCI who had cardiogenic shock and unstable or decompensated heart failure (HF). From December 2010 to March 2012, 10 consecutive patients with extremely high surgical risk and hemodynamic instability underwent urgent PCI with Impella 2.5 support (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA). These patients were presented with advance HF and/or cardiogenic shock. Among the 10 included patients, 3 patients were with cardiac arrest and 1 patient was with acute myocardial infarction. All patients had successful Impella implantation and remained hemodynamically stable during high-risk PCI. Among the 10 patients 2 patients (20%) died within 1 month and 1 patient developed limb ischemia. In high-risk population nonrandomizable to PROTECT trials with advance HF/cardiogenic shock, Impella could be an important tool for hemodynamic support to PCI or could be a bridge to left ventricle assist device to achieve good recovery. Larger studies need to be conducted on this high-risk population.

摘要

PROTECT I和II试验检测了Impella在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者中的疗效。然而,严重血流动力学不稳定的患者,如心脏骤停、ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)或心源性休克患者被排除在外。目的是研究Impella在PROTECT试验未纳入的病情更重的患者群体中的疗效。这些患者因心源性休克和不稳定或失代偿性心力衰竭(HF)而需要进行高危PCI。2010年12月至2012年3月,连续10例手术风险极高且血流动力学不稳定的患者在Impella 2.5支持下(美国马萨诸塞州丹弗斯市Abiomed公司)接受了紧急PCI。这些患者表现为晚期HF和/或心源性休克。在纳入的10例患者中,3例患者发生心脏骤停,1例患者发生急性心肌梗死。所有患者Impella植入均成功,且在高危PCI期间血流动力学保持稳定。10例患者中有2例(20%)在1个月内死亡,1例患者发生肢体缺血。在无法随机纳入PROTECT试验的伴有晚期HF/心源性休克的高危人群中,Impella可能是PCI血流动力学支持的重要工具,或者可能是通向左心室辅助装置以实现良好恢复的桥梁。需要对这一高危人群开展更大规模的研究。