• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心源性休克患者使用经皮左心室辅助装置的性别差异:来自经皮心室辅助装置工作组

Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.

作者信息

Doshi Rajkumar, Patel Krunalkumar, Decter Dean, Jauhar Rajiv, Meraj Perwaiz

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.

Department of Cardiology, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 2018 Jul;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009
PMID:30122245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6097167/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemodynamic support with Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) devices is becoming a more prevalent treatment option for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There exists only limited published data regarding outcome differences between male and female patients. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to analyze these gender differences between short-term survival and in-hospital outcomes in those undergoing PCI with CS.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and July 2016, patients undergoing PCI with simultaneous use of Impella were identified. Only patients presenting with CS were included in the analysis. All-cause in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Using SAS 9.4 for propensity score matching, additional secondary outcomes were also compared.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was comparable between males and females (39.5% vs. 26.3%, p=0.33) in CS patients. Secondary outcomes were also comparable and included: myocardial infarction, stroke, CS, heart failure, dialysis requirement, bleeding within 72h, blood transfusion, dysrhythmia, composite of all complications, major adverse cardiac events. Survival at 30days was equal in both groups. A reduced mortality in males was noted for pre-PCI initiation of Impella. Additionally, both genders who received pre-PCI Impella support, experienced a significant reduction in inotrope use.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the small number of cohorts, this study did not reveal any significant differences among gender with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS. However, initiation of Impella prior to PCI may be associated with improved mortality and morbidity in both genders.

摘要

背景

对于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的心源性休克(CS)患者,使用Impella(美国马萨诸塞州丹弗斯市的Abiomed公司)设备进行血流动力学支持正成为一种越来越普遍的治疗选择。关于男性和女性患者结局差异的已发表数据有限。因此,本文的目的是分析接受PCI合并CS患者在短期生存和院内结局方面的这些性别差异。

方法

在2011年1月至2016年7月期间,确定同时使用Impella进行PCI的患者。仅纳入表现为CS的患者进行分析。全因院内死亡率是主要结局。使用SAS 9.4进行倾向评分匹配,还比较了其他次要结局。

结果

CS患者中,男性和女性的主要结局相当(39.5%对26.3%,p = 0.33)。次要结局也相当,包括:心肌梗死、中风、CS、心力衰竭、透析需求、72小时内出血、输血、心律失常、所有并发症的综合、主要不良心脏事件。两组30天生存率相等。注意到在PCI前启动Impella的男性死亡率降低。此外,接受PCI前Impella支持的两性患者,血管活性药物的使用均显著减少。

结论

尽管队列数量较少,但本研究未发现急性心肌梗死合并CS患者在使用经皮左心室辅助设备进行PCI时,性别之间存在任何显著差异。然而,在PCI前启动Impella可能与两性患者死亡率和发病率的改善相关。

相似文献

1
Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心源性休克患者使用经皮左心室辅助装置的性别差异:来自经皮心室辅助装置工作组
Indian Heart J. 2018 Jul;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
2
Gender difference with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: From pVAD Working Group.性别差异与使用经皮左心室辅助装置在接受复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中的应用:来自 pVAD 工作组。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Jun;8(4):369-378. doi: 10.1177/2048872617745790. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
3
Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.在一家没有现场手术支持的农村社区医院,使用Impella进行血流动力学支持治疗急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的结果。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Feb;31(2):E23-E29. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00252.
4
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
5
Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization.在心原性休克或高危经皮冠状动脉血运重建中 Impella 植入的时机和结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 1;98(2):E222-E234. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29674. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
6
Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前左心室卸载与伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死患者生存率的改善相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jun;39:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.使用Impella与主动脉内球囊泵对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征和心源性休克患者进行经皮机械循环支持的医疗资源利用比较:来自全国住院患者样本的见解
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Jan;49(1 Pt A):102053. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102053. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
8
Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival.在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者进行无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)之前启动Impella 2.5可提高早期生存率。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Jun;30(3):256-263. doi: 10.1111/joic.12377. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
9
Women With Cardiogenic Shock Derive Greater Benefit From Early Mechanical Circulatory Support: An Update From the cVAD Registry.心源性休克女性患者从早期机械循环支持中获益更大:来自连续血流动力学辅助装置(cVAD)注册研究的最新情况
J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Jun;29(3):248-56. doi: 10.1111/joic.12298. Epub 2016 May 26.
10
Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.机械循环支持与单独使用血管加压素在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者中的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;103(1):30-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30913. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Impella 5.5 use in women: A multicenter study.女性使用Impella 5.5:一项多中心研究。
JHLT Open. 2025 Jul 10;9:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100341. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Contemporary optimal therapeutic strategy with escalation/de-escalation of temporary mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock and advanced heart failure in Japan.日本心源性休克和晚期心力衰竭患者临时机械循环支持的升级/降级当代最佳治疗策略
J Artif Organs. 2025 Jun;28(2):103-109. doi: 10.1007/s10047-024-01471-x. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
3
Sex differences in treatments and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender difference with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: From pVAD Working Group.性别差异与使用经皮左心室辅助装置在接受复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中的应用:来自 pVAD 工作组。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Jun;8(4):369-378. doi: 10.1177/2048872617745790. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.机械循环辅助装置在心源性休克中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004337.
3
Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival.
性别对心原性休克患者治疗效果和预后的影响:系统回顾和流行病学荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Jun 6;28(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04973-5.
4
The Therapeutic Use of Impella Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review.Impella装置在心源性休克中的治疗应用:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2022 Oct 7;14(10):e30045. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30045. eCollection 2022 Oct.
在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者进行无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)之前启动Impella 2.5可提高早期生存率。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Jun;30(3):256-263. doi: 10.1111/joic.12377. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
4
Effect of Early Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Survival in Cardiogenic Shock.早期启动机械循环支持对心源性休克患者生存率的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;119(6):845-851. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.037. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
5
A multi-institutional outcome analysis of patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation stratified by sex and race.一项对接受左心室辅助装置植入术的患者进行的多机构预后分析,按照性别和种族分层。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jan;36(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.027. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
6
Sex differences and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support implantation.接受机械循环支持植入患者的性别差异及院内结局
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jan;36(1):82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
7
Women With Cardiogenic Shock Derive Greater Benefit From Early Mechanical Circulatory Support: An Update From the cVAD Registry.心源性休克女性患者从早期机械循环支持中获益更大:来自连续血流动力学辅助装置(cVAD)注册研究的最新情况
J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Jun;29(3):248-56. doi: 10.1111/joic.12298. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Gender differences in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.心肌梗死后心原性休克患者的性别差异:IABP-SHOCK II 试验的亚研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Jan;104(1):71-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0767-2. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
9
The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry.Impella 2.5在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克中的当前应用:来自USpella注册研究的结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Feb;27(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/joic.12080. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
10
Gender comparisons in cardiogenic shock during ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention.性别比较在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的心源性休克中的作用。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;112(5):636-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.038. Epub 2013 May 24.