监管：美国食品药品监督管理局（FDA）对消费者基因组学过于谨慎。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Regulation: The FDA is overcautious on consumer genomics.

作者信息

Green Robert C, Farahany Nita A

出版信息

Nature. 2014 Jan 16;505(7483):286-7. doi: 10.1038/505286a.

DOI:10.1038/505286a

PMID:24436984

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Regulation: The FDA is overcautious on consumer genomics.

Nature. 2014 Jan 16;505(7483):286-7. doi: 10.1038/505286a.

Which way for genetic-test regulation? Assign regulation appropriate to the level of risk.

Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):817-8. doi: 10.1038/466817a.

Direct to consumer genetic tests.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Sep;17(9):1111. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.66. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

The FDA and 23andMe: violating the First Amendment or protecting the rights of consumers?

Clin Chem. 2014 Jun;60(6):835-7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.223321. Epub 2014 May 1.

Which way for genetic-test regulation? Leave test interpretation to specialists.

Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):816-7. doi: 10.1038/466816a.

Worth waiting for.

Nature. 2010 Nov 11;468(7321):134. doi: 10.1038/468134a.

Putting DNA to the test.

Nature. 2009 Oct 8;461(7265):697-8. doi: 10.1038/461697b.

FDA to regulate direct-to-consumer genetic tests.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Nov 3;102(21):1610-2, 1617. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq446. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

Clinical application of genomic high-throughput data: Infrastructural, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects.

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Feb;31:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

Evolution of cancer risk assessment and counseling related to psychological, financial and legal implications.

Fam Cancer. 2016 Jul;15(3):493-6. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9890-8.

引用本文的文献

Polygenic Scores in the Direct-to-Consumer Setting: Challenges and Opportunities for a New Era in Consumer Genetic Testing.

J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 23;13(4):573. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040573.

The Interface of Therapeutics and Genomics in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021 Jun;35(3):663-676. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07149-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

The Future of DTC Genomics and the Law.

J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;48(1):151-160. doi: 10.1177/1073110520917003.

Direct-to-Consumer Genomics: Harmful or Empowering?: It is important to stress that genetic risk is not the same as genetic destiny.

Mo Med. 2017 Jan-Feb;114(1):26-32.

Sequencing Newborns: A Call for Nuanced Use of Genomic Technologies.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Jul;48 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2-S6. doi: 10.1002/hast.874.

Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;26(8):1101-1112. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Ethical issues in neurogenetics.

Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;147:23-36. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63233-3.00003-8.

Diet and exercise changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.

BMC Med Genomics. 2017 May 2;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12920-017-0258-1.

Personal Genomic Testing for Cancer Risk: Results From the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.

J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):636-644. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1503. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

Implications of Personal Genomic Testing for Health Behaviors: The Case of Smoking.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Dec;18(12):2273-2277. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw168. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Regulation: The FDA is overcautious on consumer genomics.

Nature. 2014 Jan 16;505(7483):286-7. doi: 10.1038/505286a.

Which way for genetic-test regulation? Assign regulation appropriate to the level of risk.

Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):817-8. doi: 10.1038/466817a.

Direct to consumer genetic tests.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Sep;17(9):1111. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.66. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

The FDA and 23andMe: violating the First Amendment or protecting the rights of consumers?

Clin Chem. 2014 Jun;60(6):835-7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.223321. Epub 2014 May 1.

Which way for genetic-test regulation? Leave test interpretation to specialists.

Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):816-7. doi: 10.1038/466816a.

Worth waiting for.

Nature. 2010 Nov 11;468(7321):134. doi: 10.1038/468134a.

Putting DNA to the test.

Nature. 2009 Oct 8;461(7265):697-8. doi: 10.1038/461697b.

FDA to regulate direct-to-consumer genetic tests.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Nov 3;102(21):1610-2, 1617. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq446. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

Clinical application of genomic high-throughput data: Infrastructural, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects.

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Feb;31:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

Evolution of cancer risk assessment and counseling related to psychological, financial and legal implications.

Fam Cancer. 2016 Jul;15(3):493-6. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9890-8.

引用本文的文献

Polygenic Scores in the Direct-to-Consumer Setting: Challenges and Opportunities for a New Era in Consumer Genetic Testing.

J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 23;13(4):573. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040573.

The Interface of Therapeutics and Genomics in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021 Jun;35(3):663-676. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07149-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

The Future of DTC Genomics and the Law.

J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;48(1):151-160. doi: 10.1177/1073110520917003.

Direct-to-Consumer Genomics: Harmful or Empowering?: It is important to stress that genetic risk is not the same as genetic destiny.

Mo Med. 2017 Jan-Feb;114(1):26-32.

Sequencing Newborns: A Call for Nuanced Use of Genomic Technologies.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Jul;48 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2-S6. doi: 10.1002/hast.874.

Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;26(8):1101-1112. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Ethical issues in neurogenetics.

Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;147:23-36. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63233-3.00003-8.

Diet and exercise changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.

BMC Med Genomics. 2017 May 2;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12920-017-0258-1.

Personal Genomic Testing for Cancer Risk: Results From the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.

J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):636-644. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1503. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

Implications of Personal Genomic Testing for Health Behaviors: The Case of Smoking.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Dec;18(12):2273-2277. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw168. Epub 2016 Jul 12.