• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚人对个人基因组检测的看法:Genioz 研究的焦点小组结果。

Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;26(8):1101-1112. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1
PMID:29706641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6057916/
Abstract

Personal genomic testing provides healthy individuals with access to information about their genetic makeup for purposes including ancestry, paternity, sporting ability and health. Such tests are available commercially and globally, with accessibility expected to continue to grow, including in Australia; yet little is known of the views/expectations of Australians. Focus groups were conducted within a multi-stage, cross-disciplinary project (Genioz) to explore this. In mid-2015, 56 members of the public participated in seven focus groups, allocated into three age groups: 18-24, 25-49, and ≥50 years. Three researchers coded transcripts independently and generated themes. Awareness of personal genomic testing was low, but most could deduce what "personal genomics" might entail. Very few had heard of the term "direct-to-consumer" testing, which has implications for organisations developing information to support individuals in their decision-making. Participants' understanding of genetics was varied and drawn from several sources. There were diverse perceptions of the relative influence of genetics and environment on health, mental health, behavior, talent, or personality. Views about having a personal genomic test were mixed, with greater interest in health-related tests if they believed there was a reason for doing so. However, many expressed scepticisms about the types of tests available, and how the information might be used; concerns were also raised about privacy and the potential for discrimination. These exploratory findings inform subsequent stages of the Genioz study, thereby contributing to strategies of supporting Australians to understand and make meaningful and well-considered decisions about the benefits, harms, and implications of personal genomic tests.

摘要

个人基因组测试为健康个体提供了获取其基因构成信息的途径,目的包括了解祖先、亲子关系、运动能力和健康状况。此类测试可在商业和全球范围内获得,预计其可及性将继续增加,包括在澳大利亚;然而,人们对澳大利亚人的看法和期望知之甚少。焦点小组在一个多阶段、跨学科的项目(Genioz)中进行,以探讨这一问题。2015 年年中,56 名公众参加了 7 个焦点小组,分为 3 个年龄组:18-24 岁、25-49 岁和≥50 岁。3 名研究人员独立对转录本进行编码并生成主题。公众对个人基因组测试的认识很低,但大多数人可以推断出“个人基因组学”可能涉及的内容。很少有人听说过“直接面向消费者”的测试,这对开发信息以支持个人做出决策的组织有影响。参与者对遗传学的理解各不相同,并且来自多个来源。他们对遗传和环境对健康、心理健康、行为、才能或个性的相对影响有不同的看法。对进行个人基因组测试的看法不一,如果他们认为有理由进行测试,则对与健康相关的测试更感兴趣。然而,许多人对可用的测试类型以及如何使用信息表示怀疑;他们还对隐私和潜在歧视表示担忧。这些探索性发现为 Genioz 研究的后续阶段提供了信息,从而为支持澳大利亚人了解和做出有意义和深思熟虑的决定的策略做出了贡献,这些决定涉及个人基因组测试的益处、危害和影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120b/6057916/0e05094ca77d/41431_2018_151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120b/6057916/0e05094ca77d/41431_2018_151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120b/6057916/0e05094ca77d/41431_2018_151_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study.澳大利亚人对个人基因组检测的看法:Genioz 研究的焦点小组结果。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;26(8):1101-1112. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
2
Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.澳大利亚人对围绕个人基因检测使用的支持的看法:来自Genioz研究的结果。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.从期望到体验:个人基因组测试中的消费者自主性和选择。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):63-76. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1701583. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
4
Australians' views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz study.澳大利亚人对个人基因组检测的看法和体验:Genioz 研究的调查结果。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 May;27(5):711-720. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0325-x. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
5
Personal genomic screening: How best to facilitate preparedness of future clients.个人基因组筛查:如何更好地促进未来客户的准备工作。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 11.
6
Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Online DNA Testing.澳大利亚人类遗传学学会立场声明:在线 DNA 检测。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;23(4):256-258. doi: 10.1017/thg.2020.67. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
7
Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.澳大利亚人对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测的知识和看法。
Intern Med J. 2014 Jan;44(1):27-31. doi: 10.1111/imj.12289.
8
Consumer Health Informatics Aspects of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测的消费者健康信息学方面
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:89-93.
9
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.直接面向消费者的基因检测:用户动机、决策过程及对检测结果的感知效用
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000455006. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
10
Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports.为直接面向消费者的交互式个人基因组学报告设计提供信息。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 12;17(6):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4415.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Literacy and Knowledge Gaps and Disparities in Genetics and Oncogenomics Among Cancer Patients and the General Population: A Scoping Review.探索癌症患者和普通人群在遗传学和肿瘤基因组学方面的读写能力、知识差距及差异:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;13(2):121. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020121.
2
Information Provision Regarding Health-Related Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Dutch Consumers: An in-Depth Content Analysis of Sellers' Websites.向荷兰消费者提供的与健康相关的直接面向消费者的基因检测信息:对卖家网站的深入内容分析
Genes (Basel). 2024 Apr 20;15(4):517. doi: 10.3390/genes15040517.
3
Knowledge, awareness, and perception on genetic testing for primary immunodeficiency disease among parents in Malaysia: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetics and Insurance in Australia: Concerns around a Self-Regulated Industry.澳大利亚的遗传学与保险:对一个自我监管行业的担忧。
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(4):247-256. doi: 10.1159/000481450. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
2
Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.基因检测中的个人效用:一项系统的文献综述
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(6):662-668. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.10. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
3
'Only a click away - DTC genetics for ancestry, health, love…and more: A view of the business and regulatory landscape'.
马来西亚父母对原发性免疫缺陷病基因检测的知识、意识和看法:一项定性研究。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 12;14:1308305. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1308305. eCollection 2023.
4
Public attitudes towards genomic data sharing: results from a provincial online survey in Canada.公众对基因组数据共享的态度:加拿大某省在线调查结果
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 7;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00967-0.
5
Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases.澳大利亚父母对非传染性疾病新生儿基因筛查的看法。
Front Genet. 2023 Jun 26;14:1209762. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762. eCollection 2023.
6
How does the genomic naive public perceive whole genomic testing for health purposes? A scoping review.公众对基于全基因组的健康检测持何种态度?——一项范围综述。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Jan;31(1):35-47. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01208-5. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
7
The expectations and realities of nutrigenomic testing in australia: A qualitative study.澳大利亚营养基因组检测的期望与现实:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):670-686. doi: 10.1111/hex.13216. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
8
Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review.组学科学领域中公民的态度、知识和教育需求:一项系统的文献综述
Front Genet. 2020 Oct 23;11:570649. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.570649. eCollection 2020.
9
From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.从期望到体验:个人基因组测试中的消费者自主性和选择。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):63-76. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1701583. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
10
Healthcare System Priorities for Successful Integration of Genomics: An Australian Focus.基因组学成功整合的医疗保健系统优先事项:以澳大利亚为重点
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 11;7:41. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00041. eCollection 2019.
只需轻轻一点——用于血统、健康、爱情……及更多方面的直接面向消费者的基因检测:商业与监管格局之审视
Appl Transl Genom. 2016 Feb 2;8:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Mar.
4
The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.传达疾病遗传风险对降低风险的健康行为的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1102.
5
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.基于互联网的直接面向消费者的基因检测:一项系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 14;17(12):e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4378.
6
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for predicting sports performance and talent identification: Consensus statement.用于预测运动表现和人才识别的直接面向消费者的基因检测:共识声明。
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;49(23):1486-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095343.
7
Public reaction to direct-to-consumer online genetic tests: Comparing attitudes, trust and intentions across commercial and conventional providers.公众对直接面向消费者的在线基因检测的反应:比较商业机构与传统机构的态度、信任度及意愿。
Public Underst Sci. 2015 Aug;24(6):731-50. doi: 10.1177/0963662513519937. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
8
Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.澳大利亚人对直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测的知识和看法。
Intern Med J. 2014 Jan;44(1):27-31. doi: 10.1111/imj.12289.
9
Regulation: The FDA is overcautious on consumer genomics.监管:美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对消费者基因组学过于谨慎。
Nature. 2014 Jan 16;505(7483):286-7. doi: 10.1038/505286a.
10
Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing is associated with increased physician utilisation.直接面向消费者的药物基因组检测与医生利用率的提高有关。
J Med Genet. 2014 Feb;51(2):83-9. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101909. Epub 2013 Dec 16.