• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种 A 型肉毒毒素在额部的扩散:双盲、随机、对照研究。

Diffusion of two botulinum toxins type A on the forehead: double-blinded, randomized, controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Cosmetic Dermatology, WorldPath Clinic International, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2014 Feb;40(2):184-92. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12405. Epub 2014 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1111/dsu.12405
PMID:24438121
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different diffusion of different botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) preparations may account for differences in outcomes in cosmetic clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

A double-blind, randomized, self-controlled study was performed to evaluate the diffusion characteristics of onabotulinumtoxinA and a Chinese type A botulinum toxin (CBTX-A).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Healthy volunteers (N = 20) were recruited to receive a 0.05-mL (2 U) injection of BoTNA at four forehead sites (medial forehead (subcutaneous (SC)) and temporal forehead (intradermal (ID))). On day 14, the Minor's iodine starch test was performed and photographs were taken for calculating the area and dimensions of anhydrotic area.

RESULTS

When BoNTAs were different, the anhidrosis ID area was significantly greater with CBTX-A than onabotulinumtoxinA, the vertical dimension was significantly longer with CBTX-A ID than onabotulinumtoxinA ID and the horizontal dimension was significantly greater with CBTX-A ID than onabotulinumtoxinA ID. The area of anhidrosis SC was significantly greater with CBTX-A than onabotulinumtoxinA. When injection depths were different, the mean horizontal dimension was significantly greater with onabotulinumtoxinA SC than ID. Comparing the dimension of the same BoNTA and injection method, the vertical dimension was significantly greater than the horizontal dimension.

CONCLUSION

OnabotulinumtoxinA diffuses less than CBTX-A. ID injection technique may result in less diffusion than SC.

摘要

背景

不同的肉毒毒素 A 型(BoNTA)制剂的扩散不同可能导致美容临床实践中结果的差异。

目的

进行了一项双盲、随机、自身对照研究,以评估肉毒毒素 A 型(BoNTA)和中国肉毒毒素 A 型(CBTX-A)的扩散特性。

材料和方法

招募了 20 名健康志愿者,在四个额部部位(额内侧(皮下(SC))和额颞部(皮内(ID)))接受 0.05 毫升(2 U)的 BoTNA 注射。第 14 天,进行 Minor's 碘淀粉试验,并拍摄照片以计算无汗区的面积和尺寸。

结果

当 BoNTAs 不同时,CBTX-A 的 ID 无汗区面积明显大于 onabotulinumtoxinA,CBTX-A ID 的垂直尺寸明显长于 onabotulinumtoxinA ID,CBTX-A ID 的水平尺寸明显大于 onabotulinumtoxinA ID。CBTX-A 的 SC 无汗区面积明显大于 onabotulinumtoxinA。当注射深度不同时,onabotulinumtoxinA SC 的平均水平尺寸明显大于 ID。比较相同 BoNTA 和注射方法的尺寸,垂直尺寸明显大于水平尺寸。

结论

onabotulinumtoxinA 的扩散小于 CBTX-A。ID 注射技术可能导致扩散小于 SC。

相似文献

1
Diffusion of two botulinum toxins type A on the forehead: double-blinded, randomized, controlled study.两种 A 型肉毒毒素在额部的扩散:双盲、随机、对照研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2014 Feb;40(2):184-92. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12405. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
2
Different formulations of botulinum toxin type A have different migration characteristics: a double-blind, randomized study.不同剂型的A型肉毒毒素具有不同的扩散特性:一项双盲随机研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008 Mar;7(1):50-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00361.x.
3
Fields of effects of 2 commercial preparations of botulinum toxin type A at equal labeled unit doses: a double-blind randomized trial.2 种市售 A 型肉毒毒素制剂等标示单位剂量的作用范围:一项双盲随机试验。
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Dec;149(12):1386-91. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6440.
4
Pilot study comparing the diffusion of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A in patients with forehead hyperhidrosis.比较两种A型肉毒杆菌毒素制剂在额头多汗症患者中扩散情况的初步研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1 Spec No.):S37-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32330.x.
5
Comparison of the spread of three botulinum toxin type A preparations.三种肉毒毒素 A 制剂扩散的比较。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2012 Mar;304(2):155-61. doi: 10.1007/s00403-011-1179-z. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
6
Split-face double-blind study comparing the onset of action of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA.比较A型肉毒杆菌毒素(onabotulinumtoxinA)和A型肉毒杆菌毒素(abobotulinumtoxinA)起效时间的半脸双盲研究。
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012 May-Jun;14(3):198-204. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2011.1142.
7
A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Investigate the Equivalence of IncobotulinumtoxinA and OnabotulinumtoxinA for Glabellar Frown Lines.一项随机双盲试验,旨在研究注射用A型肉毒毒素(IncoBotulinumtoxinA)与A型肉毒毒素(OnabotulinumtoxinA)治疗眉间皱纹的等效性。
Dermatol Surg. 2015 Nov;41(11):1310-9. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000531.
8
Botulinum toxin type B (MYOBLOC) versus botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) frontalis study: rate of onset and radius of diffusion.B型肉毒杆菌毒素(MYOBLOC)与A型肉毒杆菌毒素(保妥适)治疗额肌的研究:起效速度与扩散半径
Dermatol Surg. 2003 May;29(5):519-22; discussion 522. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29124.x.
9
Field effect of two commercial preparations of botulinum toxin type A: a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial.两种商业制备的肉毒毒素 A 的场效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Aug;67(2):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
10
Two different types of botulinum toxins: Is there a difference in efficacy and longevity?两种不同类型的肉毒杆菌毒素:其疗效和持续时间是否存在差异?
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Dec;18(6):1635-1641. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12949. Epub 2019 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Rosacea: A Systematic Review.A型肉毒杆菌毒素治疗酒渣鼻的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Dec 29;15(12):e51304. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51304. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
A Proposal for Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Into the Temporal Region in Chronic Migraine Headache.慢性偏头痛头痛患者颞区注射肉毒毒素 A 治疗的提案。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Mar 28;12(4):214. doi: 10.3390/toxins12040214.
3
Comparing lanbotulinumtoxinA (Hengli) with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) in the mouse hemidiaphragm assay.
比较衡力肉毒毒素(Hengli)与保妥适肉毒毒素(Botox)和吉适肉毒毒素(Xeomin)在小鼠膈神经膈肌试验中的作用。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2019 Dec;126(12):1625-1629. doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02100-1. Epub 2019 Nov 9.