Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ophthalmology. 2014 May;121(5):1054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.026. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
PURPOSE: To determine precisely the mean change in refractive power induced by treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty eyes of 50 consecutive patients with clinically significant macular edema receiving all 3 types of current state-of-the-art treatment with intravitreal antiedematous substances (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or triamcinolone). METHODS: Patients were followed up at monthly intervals and were treated following a standardized pro re nata regimen according to protocol. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was determined by certified visual acuity examiners. The refractive power of the treated eyes was determined using a push-plus technique. The change in refraction between baseline and the visit when the macula was completely dry or when the central subfield thickness (CST) measured by optical coherence tomography had reached the thinnest level was analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and CST. RESULTS: Fifty eyes of 50 patients received intravitreal therapy using ranibizumab (n = 11), bevacizumab (n = 20), or triamcinolone (n = 19). Mean BCVA was 0.33±0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and mean CST was 492±130 μm. The mean SER was 0.41±2.06 diopters (D) at baseline. The BCVA at the time of optimal retinal morphologic features was 0.24±0.2 logMAR, mean CST was 300±78 μm, and mean change in SER was -0.01±0.46 D. Changes is BCVA and CST were statistically significant (P < 0.0001), but the SER change was not (P = 0.824). CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate spectacle correction can be prescribed to patients with DME any time during ongoing therapy using antiedematous substances because resolution of retinal thickening is not associated with an increased risk of a myopic shift.
目的:准确确定糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者治疗后屈光力的平均变化。
设计:前瞻性、随机研究。
参与者:50 例连续患者的 50 只眼,这些患者患有临床显著的黄斑水肿,接受了所有 3 种当前最先进的治疗方法,包括玻璃体内抗水肿物质(雷珠单抗、贝伐单抗或曲安奈德)。
方法:患者每月随访一次,并根据方案的标准 pro re nata 方案进行治疗。由经过认证的视力检查员确定最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。通过推-加技术确定治疗眼的屈光力。分析从基线到黄斑完全干燥或光学相干断层扫描(OCT)测量的中央子场厚度(CST)达到最薄水平时的屈光度变化。
主要观察指标:球镜等效屈光度(SER)和 CST。
结果:50 例患者的 50 只眼接受了雷珠单抗(n = 11)、贝伐单抗(n = 20)或曲安奈德(n = 19)的玻璃体内治疗。平均 BCVA 为 0.33±0.23 对数最小角分辨率(logMAR),平均 CST 为 492±130μm。基线时平均 SER 为 0.41±2.06 屈光度(D)。当视网膜形态学特征达到最佳时,BCVA 为 0.24±0.2 logMAR,平均 CST 为 300±78μm,SER 平均变化为-0.01±0.46 D。BCVA 和 CST 的变化具有统计学意义(P<0.0001),但 SER 变化无统计学意义(P = 0.824)。
结论:在使用抗水肿物质进行持续治疗的任何时候,都可以为 DME 患者开具适当的眼镜矫正处方,因为视网膜增厚的消退与近视漂移的风险增加无关。
Ophthalmology. 2014-1-17
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011-6-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-11-17
Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2015-12-19