White Kari, Potter Joseph E
Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Contraception. 2014 Jun;89(6):550-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
Cross-sectional studies have found that low-income and racial/ethnic minority women are more likely to use female sterilization and less likely to rely on a partner's vasectomy than women with higher incomes and whites. However, studies of pregnant and postpartum women report that racial/ethnic minorities, particularly low-income minority women, face greater barriers in obtaining a sterilization than do whites and those with higher incomes. In this paper, we address this apparent contradiction by examining the likelihood a woman gets a sterilization following each delivery, which removes from the comparison any difference in the number of births she has experienced.
Using the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth, we fit multivariable-adjusted logistic and Cox regression models to estimate odds ratios and hazard ratios for getting a postpartum or interval sterilization, respectively, according to race/ethnicity and insurance status.
Women's chances of obtaining a sterilization varied by both race/ethnicity and insurance. Among women with Medicaid, whites were more likely to use female sterilization than African Americans and Latinas. Privately insured whites were more likely to rely on vasectomy than African Americans and Latinas, but among women with Medicaid-paid deliveries reliance on vasectomy was low for all racial/ethnic groups.
Low-income racial/ethnic minority women are less likely to undergo sterilization following delivery compared to low-income whites and privately insured women of similar parities. This could result from unique barriers to obtaining permanent contraception and could expose women to the risk of future unintended pregnancies.
Low-income minorities are less likely to undergo sterilization than low-income whites and privately insured minorities, which may result from barriers to obtaining permanent contraception, and exposes women to unintended pregnancies.
横断面研究发现,与高收入女性和白人女性相比,低收入以及少数族裔女性更有可能选择女性绝育手术,而较少依赖伴侣的输精管切除术。然而,针对怀孕和产后女性的研究报告称,少数族裔,尤其是低收入少数族裔女性,在获得绝育手术方面面临的障碍比白人和高收入女性更大。在本文中,我们通过研究女性在每次分娩后接受绝育手术的可能性来解决这一明显的矛盾,这消除了比较中她所经历生育次数的任何差异。
利用2006 - 2010年全国家庭成长调查,我们拟合了多变量调整的逻辑回归模型和Cox回归模型,分别根据种族/族裔和保险状况来估计产后或间隔期绝育的优势比和风险比。
女性获得绝育手术的机会因种族/族裔和保险情况而异。在接受医疗补助的女性中,白人比非裔美国人和拉丁裔更有可能选择女性绝育手术。有私人保险的白人比非裔美国人和拉丁裔更有可能依赖输精管切除术,但在医疗补助支付分娩费用的女性中,所有种族/族裔群体对输精管切除术的依赖程度都很低。
与低收入白人以及 parity 相似的有私人保险的女性相比,低收入少数族裔女性在分娩后接受绝育手术的可能性较小。这可能是由于获得永久避孕措施存在独特障碍,并且可能使女性面临未来意外怀孕的风险。
低收入少数族裔比低收入白人和有私人保险的少数族裔接受绝育手术的可能性更小,这可能是由于获得永久避孕措施存在障碍,并使女性面临意外怀孕的风险。