Khayambashi Khalil, Fallah Alireza, Movahedi Ahmadreza, Bagwell Jennifer, Powers Christopher
College of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Jacquelin Perry Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 May;95(5):900-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.022. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of posterolateral hip muscle strengthening versus quadriceps strengthening in reducing pain and improving health status in persons with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Comparative control trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation facility. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with a diagnosis of PFP (N=36; 18 men, 18 women). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were alternately assigned to a posterolateral hip muscle strengthening group (9 men and 9 women) or a quadriceps strengthening group (9 men and 9 women). The posterolateral hip muscle strengthening group performed hip abductor and external rotator strengthening exercises, whereas the quadriceps strengthening group performed quadriceps strengthening exercises (3 times a week for 8wk). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) and health status (Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Significant improvements in VAS and WOMAC scores were observed in both groups from baseline to postintervention and baseline to 6-month follow-up (P<.001). Improvements in VAS and WOMAC scores in the posterolateral hip exercise group were superior to those in the quadriceps exercise group postintervention and at 6-month follow-up (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although both intervention programs resulted in decreased pain and improved function in persons with PFP, outcomes in the posterolateral hip exercise group were superior to the quadriceps exercise group. The superior outcomes obtained in the posterolateral hip exercise group were maintained 6 months postintervention.
目的:比较加强髋关节后外侧肌肉与加强股四头肌对减轻髌股疼痛(PFP)患者的疼痛及改善其健康状况的疗效。 设计:对照比较试验。 地点:康复机构。 参与者:诊断为PFP的患者(N = 36;男性18名,女性18名)。 干预措施:患者被交替分配至髋关节后外侧肌肉强化组(9名男性和9名女性)或股四头肌强化组(9名男性和9名女性)。髋关节后外侧肌肉强化组进行髋外展肌和外旋肌强化练习,而股四头肌强化组进行股四头肌强化练习(每周3次,共8周)。 主要观察指标:在基线、干预后及6个月随访时评估疼痛(视觉模拟量表[VAS])和健康状况(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数[WOMAC])。 结果:两组从基线到干预后以及从基线到6个月随访时,VAS和WOMAC评分均有显著改善(P <.001)。干预后及6个月随访时,髋关节后外侧锻炼组VAS和WOMAC评分的改善优于股四头肌锻炼组(P <.05)。 结论:虽然两种干预方案均使PFP患者疼痛减轻、功能改善,但髋关节后外侧锻炼组的效果优于股四头肌锻炼组。髋关节后外侧锻炼组获得的较好效果在干预后6个月仍得以维持。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007-4
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025-8-11