Innes E, Straker L
School of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Shenton Park, WA, Australia.
Work. 1998;11(2):207-19. doi: 10.3233/WOR-1998-11210.
This paper is the third of a series aimed at providing clinicians with a guide to assist them in using work-related assessments appropriately. The major administration and interpretation problems facing clinicians using work-related assessments are described in detail. Administration problems are: (1) insufficient evidence of reliability and validity; and (2) potential examiner bias. Interpretation problems are: (1) inappropriate use of norm and criterion-referenced data; (2) inappropriate statistical manipulation of results; (3) difficulty in determining end-point; and (4) difficulty determining sincerity of effort. Companion papers describe the purposes of work-related assessments, and design problems in detail.
本文是系列文章中的第三篇，旨在为临床医生提供一份指南，以协助他们恰当地使用与工作相关的评估工具。文中详细描述了临床医生在使用与工作相关的评估工具时面临的主要施测和解释问题。施测问题包括：（1）信效度证据不足；（2）潜在的考官偏差。解释问题包括：（1）常模和标准参照数据的不当使用；（2）结果的不当统计处理；（3）终点确定困难；（4）努力程度的真诚性判断困难。系列中的其他文章详细描述了与工作相关的评估工具的目的和设计问题。
