Barry Declan T, Pilver Corey E, Hoff Rani A, Potenza Marc N
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine.
Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Medicine.
J Behav Addict. 2013 Sep 1;2(3):138-144. doi: 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.010.
A paucity of studies has examined the association between gambling and pain interference. We examined differences in the associations of gambling problem severity and psychiatric disorders among a nationally representative sample of adults with varying levels of pain interference.
Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were performed on National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions data from 41,987 adult respondents (48% men; 52% women), who were categorized according to two levels of pain interference (i.e., no or low pain interference [NLPI] or moderate or severe pain interference [MSPI]) and three levels of gambling problem severity (i.e., non-gamblers or low-frequency gamblers [NG], low-risk or at-risk gamblers [LRG], and problem or pathological gamblers [PPG]).
MSPI respondents exhibited higher rates of PPG than NLPI respondents. Categories of Axis I disorders and clusters of mood, anxiety and substance-use disorders showed similarly strong associations with problem-gambling severity in MSPI and NLPI groups. Similarly strong associations between Axis II disorders (and each cluster - A, B and C) and problem-gambling severity were also observed in MSPI and NLPI groups. Exploratory analyses suggested potentially stronger relationships between PPG and dysthymia, panic disorder, and dependent personality disorder and LRG and specific phobia in NLPI compared to MSPI respondents.
While MSPI is associated with PPG, largely similar patterns of associations across pain-interference levels were observed between problem-gambling severity and Axis I and Axis II psychiatric disorders.
鲜有研究探讨赌博与疼痛干扰之间的关联。我们在一个具有全国代表性的成年样本中,研究了不同疼痛干扰水平下赌博问题严重程度与精神障碍之间关联的差异。
对来自41987名成年受访者(48%为男性;52%为女性)的全国酒精及相关状况流行病学调查数据进行卡方检验和逻辑回归分析,这些受访者根据两种疼痛干扰水平(即无或低疼痛干扰[NLPI]或中度或重度疼痛干扰[MSPI])以及三种赌博问题严重程度水平(即非赌博者或低频赌博者[NG]、低风险或有风险赌博者[LRG]以及问题或病态赌博者[PPG])进行分类。
与NLPI受访者相比,MSPI受访者中PPG的发生率更高。在MSPI组和NLPI组中,I轴障碍类别以及情绪、焦虑和物质使用障碍集群与问题赌博严重程度的关联同样强烈。在MSPI组和NLPI组中,也观察到II轴障碍(以及每个集群 - A、B和C)与问题赌博严重程度之间存在同样强烈的关联。探索性分析表明,与MSPI受访者相比,NLPI受访者中PPG与恶劣心境障碍、惊恐障碍和依赖型人格障碍以及LRG与特定恐惧症之间的关系可能更强。
虽然MSPI与PPG相关,但在问题赌博严重程度与I轴和II轴精神障碍之间,在不同疼痛干扰水平上观察到的关联模式大致相似。