• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自主及明确提示的任务切换中的控制过程

Control processes in voluntary and explicitly cued task switching.

作者信息

Masson Michael E J, Carruthers Sarah

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Victoria , Victoria , BC , Canada.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Oct;67(10):1944-58. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.879390. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2013.879390
PMID:24443883
Abstract

Explicitly cued task switching slows performance relative to performing the same task on consecutive trials. This effect appears to be due partly to more efficient encoding of the task cue when the same cue is used on consecutive trials and partly to an additional task-switching process. These components were examined by comparing explicitly cued and voluntary task switching groups, with external cues presented to both groups. Cue-switch effects varied in predictable ways to dissociate explicitly cued and voluntary task switching, whereas task-switch effects had similar characteristics for both instructional groups. The data were well fitted by a mathematical model of task switching that included a cue-encoding mechanism (whereby cue repetition improves performance) and an additional process that was invoked on task-switch trials. Analyses of response-time distributions suggest that this additional process involves task-set reconfiguration that may or may not be engaged before the target stimulus is presented.

摘要

与在连续试验中执行相同任务相比,明确提示的任务切换会降低表现。这种效应似乎部分归因于当在连续试验中使用相同提示时任务提示的编码更有效,部分归因于额外的任务切换过程。通过比较明确提示组和自主任务切换组来检验这些成分,向两组都呈现外部提示。提示切换效应以可预测的方式变化,以区分明确提示的任务切换和自主任务切换,而任务切换效应在两个指导组中具有相似的特征。数据很好地拟合了一个任务切换的数学模型,该模型包括一个提示编码机制(据此提示重复可提高表现)和一个在任务切换试验中调用的额外过程。对反应时间分布的分析表明,这个额外过程涉及任务集重新配置,这可能在目标刺激呈现之前进行,也可能不进行。

相似文献

1
Control processes in voluntary and explicitly cued task switching.自主及明确提示的任务切换中的控制过程
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Oct;67(10):1944-58. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.879390. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
2
Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.在不切换任务的情况下模拟任务切换:对明确提示表现的短期启动解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):343-67. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343.
3
You can't always get what you want: the influence of unexpected task constraint on voluntary task switching.你不可能总是心想事成:意外任务限制对自愿任务转换的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(11):2247-59. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.917115. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
4
Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.带有转换线索的线索提示任务切换中的认知控制:线索处理、任务处理以及线索 - 任务转换一致性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Oct;63(10):1916-35. doi: 10.1080/17470211003779160. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
5
ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.事件相关电位可区分切换任务集和任务线索的影响。
Brain Res. 2006 Jun 20;1095(1):107-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.016. Epub 2006 May 22.
6
Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?任务转换中的线索切换代价:线索启动还是控制过程?
Psychol Res. 2010 Sep;74(5):481-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0270-y.
7
Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?在明确的任务提示程序中分离线索编码与目标处理:是否存在“真正的”任务切换效应?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):484-502. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.484.
8
Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.考察对任务切换成本和反应重复效应的绑定作用:任务切换中线索模态和刺激模态的变化
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1632-1643. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01931-0.
9
Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人在基于线索与基于记忆的转换条件下的任务集转换。
Brain Res. 2006 Aug 11;1105(1):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.016. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
10
Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.眼跳任务切换范式中的转换、可塑性和预测
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jan;168(1-2):76-87. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0091-1. Epub 2005 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.权衡转换代价和刺激可得性收益:在可预测的动态多重任务环境中对自愿任务转换行为的研究。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):699-715. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0802-z.
2
The impact of free-order and sequential-order instructions on task-order regulation in dual tasks.自由顺序和顺序指令对双重任务中任务顺序调节的影响。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):40-53. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0910-6. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Effort in Multitasking: Local and Global Assessment of Effort.
多任务处理中的努力程度:努力程度的局部和全局评估
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 6;8:111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00111. eCollection 2017.