Padilla José-Luis, Benítez Isabel
University of Granada.
Psicothema. 2014;26(1):136-44. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.259.
Validity evidence based on response processes was first introduced explicitly as a source of validity evidence in the latest edition of Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. In this paper, we present the theory, the relationship with other sources of validity evidence, and the methods available for validation studies aimed at obtaining validity evidence about response processes.
A comprehensive review of the literature along with theoretical and practical proposals.
The articles provides arguments for determining when validity evidence based on response processes is critical for supporting the use of the test for a particular purpose, and examples of how to perform a validation study to obtain such validity evidence.
There are methods for obtaining validity evidence based on response processes. Special attention should be paid to validation studies using the cognitive interview method given its features and possibilities. Future research problems pose how to combine data from different methods -qualitative and quantitative-, to develop complete validity arguments that support the use of the test for a particular purpose.
基于作答过程的效度证据在最新版《教育和心理测验标准》中首次被明确作为效度证据的一个来源引入。在本文中，我们阐述了相关理论、它与其他效度证据来源的关系，以及用于验证性研究以获取关于作答过程的效度证据的可用方法。
对文献进行全面综述并提出理论和实践建议。
本文提供了论据，以确定基于作答过程的效度证据何时对于支持测验用于特定目的至关重要，并给出了如何开展验证性研究以获取此类效度证据的示例。
存在获取基于作答过程的效度证据的方法。鉴于认知访谈法自身的特点和可能性，在使用该方法开展验证性研究时应给予特别关注。未来的研究问题在于如何整合来自不同方法（定性和定量）的数据，以构建完整的效度论证来支持测验用于特定目的。
