Universidad de Barcelona.
Psicothema. 2018 Feb;30(1):104-109. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2017.183.
In the latest release of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, Differential Item Functioning (DIF) is considered as validity evidence based on internal structure. However, there are no indications of how to design a DIF study as a validation study. In this paper, we propose relating DIF to all sources of validity evidence, and provide a general conceptual framework for transforming “typical” DIF studies into validation studies.
We perform a comprehensive review of the literature and make theoretical and practical proposals.
The article provides arguments in favour of addressing DIF detection and interpretation as validation studies, and suggestions for conducting DIF validation studies.
The combination of quantitative and qualitative data within a mixed methods research perspective, along with planning DIF studies as validation studies, can help improve the validity of test score interpretations.
在最新发布的《教育和心理测验标准》中,基于内部结构,将项目区分度(DIF)视为有效性证据。然而,并没有关于如何将 DIF 研究设计为验证性研究的说明。在本文中,我们将 DIF 与所有有效性证据来源联系起来,并提供了一个将“典型”DIF 研究转化为验证性研究的通用概念框架。
我们对文献进行了全面的回顾,并提出了理论和实践建议。
本文提出了将 DIF 检测和解释作为验证性研究来处理的论点,并对进行 DIF 验证性研究提出了建议。
在混合方法研究视角下,将定量和定性数据相结合,并将 DIF 研究规划为验证性研究,可以帮助提高测试分数解释的有效性。