• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间指示词与感知空间:描述和记忆物体位置

Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: describing and remembering object location.

作者信息

Coventry Kenny R, Griffiths Debra, Hamilton Colin J

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, UK.

Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2014 Mar;69:46-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.001
PMID:24445332
Abstract

Spatial demonstratives - terms including this and that - are among the most common words across all languages. Yet, there are considerable differences between languages in how demonstratives carve up space and the object characteristics they can refer to, challenging the idea that the mapping between spatial demonstratives and the vision and action systems is universal. In seven experiments we show direct parallels between spatial demonstrative usage in English and (non-linguistic) memory for object location, indicating close connections between the language of space and non-linguistic spatial representation. Spatial demonstrative choice in English and immediate memory for object location are affected by a range of parameters - distance, ownership, visibility and familiarity - that are lexicalized in the demonstrative systems of some other languages. The results support a common set of constraints on language used to talk about space and on (non-linguistic) spatial representation itself. Differences in demonstrative systems across languages may emerge from basic distinctions in the representation and memory for object location. In turn, these distinctions offer a building block from which non-spatial uses of demonstratives can develop.

摘要

空间指示词——包括“这个”和“那个”等词汇——是所有语言中最常见的词汇之一。然而,不同语言在指示词如何划分空间以及它们所指代的物体特征方面存在相当大的差异,这对空间指示词与视觉和行动系统之间的映射是普遍存在的这一观点提出了挑战。在七个实验中,我们展示了英语中空间指示词的使用与(非语言的)物体位置记忆之间的直接相似之处,这表明空间语言与非语言空间表征之间存在紧密联系。英语中空间指示词的选择以及对物体位置的即时记忆会受到一系列参数的影响——距离、所属关系、可见性和熟悉程度——这些参数在其他一些语言的指示词系统中被词汇化。这些结果支持了一组关于用于谈论空间的语言以及(非语言的)空间表征本身的共同限制。不同语言中指示词系统的差异可能源于物体位置表征和记忆中的基本区别。反过来,这些区别为指示词的非空间用法的发展提供了一个基石。

相似文献

1
Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: describing and remembering object location.空间指示词与感知空间:描述和记忆物体位置
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Mar;69:46-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
2
Language within your reach: near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives.触手可及的语言:近-远感知空间与空间指示词
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):889-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
3
The extended development of mapping spatial demonstratives onto space.将空间指示词映射到空间的扩展发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Mar;215:105336. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105336. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
4
Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: To reach or not to reach?空间指示词与感知空间:伸手可及还是遥不可及?
Cognition. 2019 Oct;191:103989. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
5
Language and memory for object location.语言与物体位置记忆。
Cognition. 2016 Aug;153:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 May 11.
6
Demonstrative systems: From linguistic typology to social cognition.指示系统:从语言类型学到社会认知。
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Dec;139:101519. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101519. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
7
The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition.(空间)记忆游戏:测试空间语言、物体知识和空间认知之间的关系。
J Vis Exp. 2018 Feb 19(132):56495. doi: 10.3791/56495.
8
Space Trumps Time When Talking About Objects.谈论物体时,空间胜过时间。
Cogn Sci. 2019 Mar;43(3):e12719. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12719.
9
"Near" and "far" in language and perception.语言与认知中的“近”和“远”
Cognition. 1999 Nov 9;73(1):35-63. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00040-2.
10
Spatial communication systems across languages reflect universal action constraints.跨语言的空间通讯系统反映了普遍的动作约束。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;7(12):2099-2110. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01697-4. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Inferring Depression and Its Semantic Underpinnings from Simple Lexical Choices.从简单的词汇选择推断抑郁症及其语义基础。
Depress Anxiety. 2024 Mar 28;2024:3010831. doi: 10.1155/2024/3010831. eCollection 2024.
2
Imagery and Verbal Strategies in Spatial Memory for Route and Survey Descriptions.路线和全景描述的空间记忆中的意象与言语策略
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 20;14(4):403. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040403.
3
Spatial communication systems across languages reflect universal action constraints.跨语言的空间通讯系统反映了普遍的动作约束。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;7(12):2099-2110. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01697-4. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
4
Choice of Mandarin Spatial Demonstratives in Distant Interaction.在远距离互动中选择普通话空间指示词。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Jun;52(3):763-785. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09927-y. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
5
From Affordances to Abstract Words: The Flexibility of Sensorimotor Grounding.从可供性到抽象词汇:感觉运动基础的灵活性
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;11(10):1304. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101304.
6
Effects of Scale on Multimodal Deixis: Evidence From Quiahije Chatino.规模对多模态指示语的影响:来自基亚希耶·查蒂诺语的证据
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:584231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584231. eCollection 2020.
7
Common Ground in Demonstrative Reference: The Case of Mano (Mande).指示性指称中的共性:马诺语(曼德语族)的例子
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 17;11:543549. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.543549. eCollection 2020.
8
Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?缩小你的指示系统:你能走多远?
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 2;11:575497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575497. eCollection 2020.
9
Interpreting Estonian Demonstratives: The Effects of Referent's Distance and Visual Salience.解读爱沙尼亚指示语:所指对象的距离和视觉显著性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 20;11:553226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.553226. eCollection 2020.
10
Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review.空间语言与社会互动中的指示语:跨学科综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 25;11:555265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555265. eCollection 2020.