Mich Law Rev. 2014 Feb;112(4):663-88.
Theories of parental alienation abound in high-conflict custody cases. The image of one parent brainwashing a child against the other parent fits with what we think we know about family dynamics during divorce. The concept of a diagnosable "Parental Alienation Syndrome" ("PAS") developed as an attempt to explain this phenomenon, but it has been widely discredited by mental health professionals and thus fails the standard for evidentiary admissibility. Nevertheless, PAS and related theories continue to influence the decisions of family courts, and even in jurisdictions that explicitly reject such theories, judges still face the daunting task of resolving these volatile cases. In the midst of this highly adversarial process, children deserve independent representation to ensure that their interests remain front and center. Mandating the appointment of guardians ad litem in cases involving allegations of abuse or alienation will assist courts in conducting individualized, fact-specific investigations into such allegations to craft custody orders that serve the best interests of children.
在高冲突监护权案件中,存在大量的亲权剥夺理论。父母一方对孩子洗脑,使其反对另一方父母的形象符合我们对离婚期间家庭动态的了解。为了解释这种现象,“亲权剥夺综合征”(PAS)这一可诊断的概念应运而生,但它已被心理健康专业人士广泛否定,因此不符合证据可采性的标准。尽管如此,PAS 及相关理论仍继续影响家庭法庭的判决,即使在明确拒绝此类理论的司法管辖区,法官仍然面临解决这些激烈案件的艰巨任务。在这种高度对抗性的过程中,儿童应该得到独立代表,以确保他们的利益始终处于首位。在涉及虐待或亲权剥夺指控的案件中强制任命诉讼监护人,将有助于法院对这些指控进行个性化、具体事实的调查,从而制定符合儿童最佳利益的监护令。