Ritchie Andrew W, Webb Lauren J
Department of Chemistry, Center for Nano- and Molecular Science and Technology, and Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin , 1 University Station, A5300, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
J Phys Chem B. 2014 Jul 17;118(28):7692-702. doi: 10.1021/jp4092656. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
We have examined the effects of including explicit, near-probe solvent molecules in a continuum electrostatics strategy using the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation with the Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver (APBS) to calculate electric fields at the midpoint of a nitrile bond both at the surface of a monomeric protein and when docked at a protein-protein interface. Results were compared to experimental vibrational absorption energy measurements of the nitrile oscillator. We examined three methods for selecting explicit water molecules: (1) all water molecules within 5 Å of the nitrile nitrogen; (2) the water molecule closest to the nitrile nitrogen; and (3) any single water molecule hydrogen-bonding to the nitrile. The correlation between absolute field strengths with experimental absorption energies were calculated and it was observed that method 1 was only an improvement for the monomer calculations, while methods 2 and 3 were not significantly different from the purely implicit solvent calculations for all protein systems examined. Upon taking the difference in calculated electrostatic fields and comparing to the difference in absorption frequencies, we typically observed an increase in experimental correlation for all methods, with method 1 showing the largest gain, likely due to the improved absolute monomer correlations using that method. These results suggest that, unlike with quantum mechanical methods, when calculating absolute fields using entirely classical models, implicit solvent is typically sufficient and additional work to identify hydrogen-bonding or nearest waters does not significantly impact the results. Although we observed that a sphere of solvent near the field of interest improved results for relative field calculations, it should not be consider a panacea for all situations.
我们使用线性泊松 - 玻尔兹曼方程和自适应泊松 - 玻尔兹曼求解器(APBS),在连续介质静电学策略中纳入明确的近探针溶剂分子,以计算单体蛋白质表面以及对接在蛋白质 - 蛋白质界面时腈键中点处的电场。将结果与腈振荡器的实验振动吸收能量测量值进行比较。我们研究了三种选择明确水分子的方法:(1)腈氮原子5埃范围内的所有水分子;(2)最靠近腈氮原子的水分子;(3)任何与腈形成氢键的单个水分子。计算了绝对场强与实验吸收能量之间的相关性,发现方法1仅在单体计算中有所改进,而方法2和3与所有研究的蛋白质系统的纯隐式溶剂计算没有显著差异。在计算静电场的差异并与吸收频率的差异进行比较时,我们通常观察到所有方法的实验相关性都有所增加,方法1显示出最大的增益,这可能是由于使用该方法时单体的绝对相关性得到了改善。这些结果表明,与量子力学方法不同,当使用完全经典的模型计算绝对场时,隐式溶剂通常就足够了,识别氢键或最近水分子的额外工作不会显著影响结果。尽管我们观察到在感兴趣的场附近的溶剂球对相对场计算有改进,但不应将其视为所有情况的万灵药。