• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

指纹比对和自动指纹识别系统中的证据评估——手指可变性的建模。

Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--Modeling between finger variability.

机构信息

Institut de Police Scientifique, School of Criminal Sciences, Building Batochime, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Feb;235:86-101. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.003
PMID:24447455
Abstract

In the context of the investigation of the use of automated fingerprint identification systems (AFIS) for the evaluation of fingerprint evidence, the current study presents investigations into the variability of scores from an AFIS system when fingermarks from a known donor are compared to fingerprints that are not from the same source. The ultimate goal is to propose a model, based on likelihood ratios, which allows the evaluation of mark-to-print comparisons. In particular, this model, through its use of AFIS technology, benefits from the possibility of using a large amount of data, as well as from an already built-in proximity measure, the AFIS score. More precisely, the numerator of the LR is obtained from scores issued from comparisons between impressions from the same source and showing the same minutia configuration. The denominator of the LR is obtained by extracting scores from comparisons of the questioned mark with a database of non-matching sources. This paper focuses solely on the assignment of the denominator of the LR. We refer to it by the generic term of between-finger variability. The issues addressed in this paper in relation to between-finger variability are the required sample size, the influence of the finger number and general pattern, as well as that of the number of minutiae included and their configuration on a given finger. Results show that reliable estimation of between-finger variability is feasible with 10,000 scores. These scores should come from the appropriate finger number/general pattern combination as defined by the mark. Furthermore, strategies of obtaining between-finger variability when these elements cannot be conclusively seen on the mark (and its position with respect to other marks for finger number) have been presented. These results immediately allow case-by-case estimation of the between-finger variability in an operational setting.

摘要

在调查自动指纹识别系统(AFIS)用于评估指纹证据的过程中,本研究调查了当比较已知来源的指纹与非同一来源的指纹时,AFIS 系统的评分变化。最终目标是提出一个基于似然比的模型,该模型允许对标记与打印的比较进行评估。特别是,该模型通过使用 AFIS 技术,受益于使用大量数据的可能性,以及已经内置的接近度测量,即 AFIS 评分。更确切地说,LR 的分子是从同一来源的印痕之间进行比较并显示相同的细节配置所获得的分数得出的。LR 的分母是通过从与非匹配来源数据库的疑问标记的比较中提取分数获得的。本文仅关注 LR 分母的分配。我们将其称为一般术语的手指间变异性。本文中与手指间变异性相关的问题是所需的样本量、手指数量和一般模式的影响,以及所包含的细节数量及其在给定手指上的配置的影响。结果表明,通过 10000 个分数可以可靠地估计手指间变异性。这些分数应该来自于标记所定义的适当的手指数量/一般模式组合。此外,还提出了当无法从标记(及其相对于其他标记的位置)确定这些元素时,获取手指间变异性的策略。这些结果可以立即在操作环境中对每个案件的手指间变异性进行估计。

相似文献

1
Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--Modeling between finger variability.指纹比对和自动指纹识别系统中的证据评估——手指可变性的建模。
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Feb;235:86-101. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
2
Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.指纹比对和自动指纹识别系统中的证据评估——手指变异性建模
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Apr 11;167(2-3):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
3
Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.基于自动指纹识别系统匹配分数的指纹证据评估:不同类型预处理对似然比的影响
J Forensic Sci. 2014 Jan;59(1):70-81. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12105. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
4
Introducing a semi-automatic method to simulate large numbers of forensic fingermarks for research on fingerprint identification.介绍一种用于模拟大量法医指纹以进行指纹识别研究的半自动方法。
J Forensic Sci. 2012 Mar;57(2):334-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01950.x. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
5
Performance evaluation of automated fingerprint identification systems for specific conditions observed in casework using simulated fingermarks.使用模拟指纹对司法鉴定中特定条件下自动指纹识别系统的性能评估。
J Forensic Sci. 2012 Jul;57(4):1075-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02114.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
6
Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.通过观察指印上的细节特征的空间关系、方向和类型来量化指纹证据的权重。
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Mar;248:154-71. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
7
Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae.用于三个细节特征配置的指纹识别中似然比的计算。
J Forensic Sci. 2006 Nov;51(6):1255-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00266.x.
8
Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae.针对任意数量细节特征配置的指纹识别中似然比的计算。
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):54-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00327.x.
9
Determination of AFIS "sufficiency" in friction ridge examination.确定自动指纹识别系统在摩擦嵴纹检验中的“充分性”。
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Jun;263:114-125. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
10
Altered fingerprints: analysis and detection.指纹改变:分析与检测。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2012 Mar;34(3):451-64. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.161.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the strength of palmprint comparisons: Majority identifications with surprisingly low value.量化掌纹比对的强度:多数认定的价值低得出奇。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2025 Jul 23;11:100628. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100628. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
An overview of log likelihood ratio cost in forensic science - Where is it used and what values can we expect?法医学中对数似然比代价概述——其应用于何处以及我们可预期何种值?
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Apr 17;8:100466. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100466. eCollection 2024.
3
Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system.
法医学中的概率报告与算法:美国刑事司法系统内利益相关者的观点
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Feb 12;4:100220. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100220. eCollection 2022.
4
Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap.模式与痕迹证据中算法的应用:一份负责任且实用的路线图。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Feb 18;3:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100142. eCollection 2021.
5
Likelihood ratio data to report the validation of a forensic fingerprint evaluation method.用于报告法医指纹评估方法验证的似然比数据。
Data Brief. 2016 Nov 18;10:75-92. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.008. eCollection 2017 Feb.
6
Fingerprint identification: advances since the 2009 National Research Council report.指纹识别:自2009年美国国家研究委员会报告以来的进展
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 5;370(1674). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0259.