Poorthuis Michiel H F, Brand Eelco C, Toorop Raechel J, Moll Frans L, de Borst Gert Jan
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):968-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.053. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
The occasional need for shortening of the internal carotid artery (ICA) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to correct for kinking is still controversial. Although several technical options have been suggested, the impact on perioperative outcome remains unclear, and long-term clinical follow-up is lacking. Shortening by resection has a theoretical risk for a twisted anastomosis and subsequent ICA thrombosis. Posterior transverse plication (PTP) offers an alternative shortening technique without the need for a new anastomosis. We aimed to assess the safety and patency of CEA with concomitant PTP. Secondly, we aimed to provide an overview of different technical modalities for shortening of the carotid artery in current literature.
Within the time frame of 2000 through 2011, 29 patients (mean age, 73.4 years) undergoing CEA with additional PTP of the ICA and standardized patchplasty were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, surgical procedural details, and both short- (<30 days) and long- (>30 days) term clinical and duplex ultrasound follow-up were retrieved. Restenosis was defined as ≥50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound. In addition, a literature search was performed on different techniques for ICA shortening.
Thirty-day outcome revealed no deaths or strokes. No postprocedural thrombosis or narrowing of the ipsilateral ICA was observed. During follow-up (mean, 34.3 months; range, 3-125 months), one patient (4%) died of a noncardiovascular cause. Three patients (11%) developed ipsilateral neurological symptoms (1 stroke, 2 transient ischemic attacks) after 5, 19, and 66 months follow-up, respectively. Of these, two patients (7%) had restenosis at the site of PTP. Asymptomatic restenosis occurred in one other patient (4%) after 16 months.
Although the indications for additional shortening procedures following CEA need to be defined, in this small series, PTP as an additional shortening procedure of the ICA following CEA seems feasible and safe with no additional periprocedural risk for narrowing at the plicature or thrombosis of the endarterectomy plane. However, restenosis at the plicature may hamper the long term benefit of carotid reconstruction.
颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)后偶尔需要缩短颈内动脉(ICA)以纠正扭曲,这一点仍存在争议。尽管已经提出了几种技术选择,但对围手术期结果的影响仍不明确,且缺乏长期临床随访。通过切除进行缩短在理论上有发生扭曲吻合及随后ICA血栓形成的风险。后横向折叠术(PTP)提供了一种无需新吻合的替代缩短技术。我们旨在评估CEA联合PTP的安全性和通畅性。其次,我们旨在概述当前文献中颈动脉缩短的不同技术方式。
在2000年至2011年期间,回顾性确定了29例接受CEA并附加ICA的PTP及标准化补片成形术的患者(平均年龄73.4岁)。收集患者特征、手术操作细节以及短期(<30天)和长期(>30天)的临床和双功超声随访资料。再狭窄定义为双功超声显示狭窄≥50%。此外,对ICA缩短的不同技术进行了文献检索。
30天的结果显示无死亡或卒中。未观察到术后同侧ICA血栓形成或狭窄。在随访期间(平均34.3个月;范围3 - 125个月),1例患者(4%)死于非心血管原因。3例患者(11%)分别在随访5、19和66个月后出现同侧神经症状(1例卒中,2例短暂性脑缺血发作)。其中,2例患者(7%)在PTP部位出现再狭窄。另1例患者(4%)在16个月后出现无症状再狭窄。
尽管CEA后附加缩短手术的适应证需要明确,但在这个小系列研究中,PTP作为CEA后ICA的附加缩短手术似乎是可行和安全的,在折叠处没有额外的围手术期狭窄风险或动脉内膜剥脱平面血栓形成风险。然而,折叠处的再狭窄可能会妨碍颈动脉重建的长期益处。