• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Error analysis and passage dependency of test items from a standardized test of multiple-sentence reading comprehension for aphasic and non-brain-damaged adults.

作者信息

Nicholas L E, Brookshire R H

机构信息

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1987 Nov;52(4):358-66. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5204.358.

DOI:10.1044/jshd.5204.358
PMID:2444768
Abstract

Aphasic and non-brain-damaged adults were tested with two forms of the Nelson Reading Skills Test (NRST; Hanna. Schell, & Schreiner, 1977). The NRST is a standardized measure of silent reading for students in Grades 3 through 9 and assesses comprehension of information at three levels of inference (literal, translational, and higher level). Subjects' responses to NRST test items were evaluated to determine if their performance differed on literal, translational, and higher level items. Subjects' performance was also evaluated to determine the passage dependency of NRST test items--the extent to which readers had to rely on information in the NRST reading passages to answer test items. Higher level NRST test items (requiring complex inferences) were significantly more difficult for both non-brain-damaged and aphasic adults than literal items (not requiring inferences) or translational items (requiring simple inferences). The passage dependency of NRST test items for aphasic readers was higher than those reported by Nicholas, MacLennan, and Brookshire (1986) for multiple-sentence reading tests designed for aphasic adults. This suggests that the NRST is a more valid measure of the multiple-sentence reading comprehension of aphasic adults than the other tests evaluated by Nicholas et al. (1986).

摘要

相似文献

1
Error analysis and passage dependency of test items from a standardized test of multiple-sentence reading comprehension for aphasic and non-brain-damaged adults.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1987 Nov;52(4):358-66. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5204.358.
2
Validity of multiple-sentence reading comprehension tests for aphasic adults.针对失语症成年人的多句阅读理解测试的有效性
J Speech Hear Disord. 1986 Feb;51(1):82-7. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5101.82.
3
Comprehension of directly and indirectly stated main ideas and details in discourse by brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged listeners.脑损伤和非脑损伤听众对语篇中直接和间接陈述的主要观点及细节的理解。
Brain Lang. 1984 Jan;21(1):21-36. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90033-6.
4
Comprehension of Idioms in Turkish Aphasic Participants.土耳其失语症参与者对习语的理解
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Dec;46(6):1485-1507. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9508-9.
5
Effects of pictures and picturability on sentence verification by aphasic and nonaphasic subjects.图片及可描绘性对失语症患者和非失语症患者句子验证的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Jun;24(2):292-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2402.292.
6
Developing an Arabic Screening Test for Adult-Onset Chronic Aphasia.开发一种针对成人慢性失语症的阿拉伯语筛查测试。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2018;70(2):74-81. doi: 10.1159/000490105. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
Read, Understand, Learn, & Excel (RULE): Development and Feasibility of a Reading Comprehension Measure for Postsecondary Learners.阅读、理解、学习、卓越(RULE):为高等教育学习者开发和评估阅读理解能力的工具。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov 21;27(4):1363-1374. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0221.
8
A rational inference approach to group and individual-level sentence comprehension performance in aphasia.一种针对失语症中群体和个体层面句子理解表现的合理推理方法。
Cortex. 2017 Jul;92:19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
9
Determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasic patients in sentence-picture matching tasks.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Jun;40(3):542-55. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4003.542.
10
Reading assessment post head injury: how valid is it?头部受伤后的阅读评估:其有效性如何?
Brain Inj. 1990 Apr-Jun;4(2):155-60. doi: 10.3109/02699059009026160.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of a sentence comprehension treatment on discourse comprehension in aphasia.句子理解治疗对失语症话语理解的影响。
Aphasiology. 2015 Nov 1;29(11):1289-1311. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.997182. Epub 2015 Jan 6.