Suppr超能文献

头部受伤后的阅读评估:其有效性如何?

Reading assessment post head injury: how valid is it?

作者信息

Rand M B, Trudeau M D, Nelson L K

机构信息

Division of Speech and Hearing Science, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 1990 Apr-Jun;4(2):155-60. doi: 10.3109/02699059009026160.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the passage dependency for three reading tests applied to the closed head injured (CHI) population and to determine whether reading the passage resulted in improved accuracy in responding to passage-related questions. Based on the performance of 10 CHI adults, passage dependency was low for all three tests. Only the Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia scores improved significantly when the subjects read the passages prior to responding. The results parallel those found with aphasic subjects and raise questions concerning the validity of these tests in assessing communication dysfunction post-CHI.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定应用于闭合性颅脑损伤(CHI)人群的三项阅读测试的段落依赖性,并确定阅读段落是否能提高回答与段落相关问题的准确性。基于10名成年CHI患者的表现,所有三项测试的段落依赖性都较低。只有当受试者在回答问题前阅读段落时,失语症阅读理解量表的得分才有显著提高。这些结果与失语症患者的结果相似,并引发了关于这些测试在评估CHI后沟通功能障碍有效性的问题。

相似文献

4
Acquired aphasia in children: revisited.儿童获得性失语:再探讨
Neuropsychologia. 1983;21(6):581-7. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(83)90055-6.
5
A comparison of language deficits in learning-disabled, head-injured, and nondisabled young adults: results from an abbreviated Aphasia Screening Test.
J Clin Psychol. 1990 May;46(3):310-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199005)46:3<310::aid-jclp2270460311>3.0.co;2-g.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验