• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头部受伤后的阅读评估:其有效性如何?

Reading assessment post head injury: how valid is it?

作者信息

Rand M B, Trudeau M D, Nelson L K

机构信息

Division of Speech and Hearing Science, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 1990 Apr-Jun;4(2):155-60. doi: 10.3109/02699059009026160.

DOI:10.3109/02699059009026160
PMID:1691940
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the passage dependency for three reading tests applied to the closed head injured (CHI) population and to determine whether reading the passage resulted in improved accuracy in responding to passage-related questions. Based on the performance of 10 CHI adults, passage dependency was low for all three tests. Only the Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia scores improved significantly when the subjects read the passages prior to responding. The results parallel those found with aphasic subjects and raise questions concerning the validity of these tests in assessing communication dysfunction post-CHI.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定应用于闭合性颅脑损伤(CHI)人群的三项阅读测试的段落依赖性,并确定阅读段落是否能提高回答与段落相关问题的准确性。基于10名成年CHI患者的表现,所有三项测试的段落依赖性都较低。只有当受试者在回答问题前阅读段落时,失语症阅读理解量表的得分才有显著提高。这些结果与失语症患者的结果相似,并引发了关于这些测试在评估CHI后沟通功能障碍有效性的问题。

相似文献

1
Reading assessment post head injury: how valid is it?头部受伤后的阅读评估:其有效性如何?
Brain Inj. 1990 Apr-Jun;4(2):155-60. doi: 10.3109/02699059009026160.
2
Performance of closed head-injured children on a naming task.闭合性头部受伤儿童在一项命名任务中的表现。
Brain Inj. 1990 Jan-Mar;4(1):27-32. doi: 10.3109/02699059009026145.
3
Sentence comprehension and production in aphasia: an application of lexical grammar.失语症中的句子理解与生成:词汇语法的应用
Adv Neurol. 1984;42:193-201.
4
Acquired aphasia in children: revisited.儿童获得性失语:再探讨
Neuropsychologia. 1983;21(6):581-7. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(83)90055-6.
5
A comparison of language deficits in learning-disabled, head-injured, and nondisabled young adults: results from an abbreviated Aphasia Screening Test.
J Clin Psychol. 1990 May;46(3):310-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199005)46:3<310::aid-jclp2270460311>3.0.co;2-g.
6
Linguistic status following closed head injury in children: a follow-up study.儿童闭合性颅脑损伤后的语言状况:一项随访研究。
Brain Inj. 1990 Apr-Jun;4(2):147-54. doi: 10.3109/02699059009026159.
7
Aphasiology: present status and trends.失语症学:现状与趋势
Adv Neurol. 1984;42:9-12.
8
Errors resembling semantic paralexias in Spanish-speaking aphasics.说西班牙语的失语症患者中类似语义性错语的错误。
Brain Lang. 1991 Oct;41(3):437-45. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(91)90165-w.
9
Some linguistic components of acalculia.失算症的一些语言成分。
Adv Neurol. 1984;42:215-22.
10
Validity of multiple-sentence reading comprehension tests for aphasic adults.针对失语症成年人的多句阅读理解测试的有效性
J Speech Hear Disord. 1986 Feb;51(1):82-7. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5101.82.