Orgeta Vasiliki, Qazi Afifa, Spector Aimee E, Orrell Martin
Mental Health Sciences Unit, University College London, 67-73 Riding House Street, 2nd Floor, Charles Bell House, London, UK, W1W 7EJ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 22;2014(1):CD009125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009125.pub2.
Experiencing anxiety and depression is very common in people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Psychological interventions have been suggested as a potential treatment for these populations. Current research suggests that people with dementia and MCI have limited opportunities for psychological treatments aimed at improving their well-being. A systematic review of the evidence on their effectiveness is likely to be useful in terms of improving outcomes for patients and for future recommendations for practice.
The main objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing anxiety and depression in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group Specialized Register and additional sources for both published and unpublished data.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a psychological intervention with usual care or a placebo intervention (social contact control) in people with dementia or MCI.
Two review authors worked independently to select trials, extract data and assess studies for risk of bias, using a data extraction form. We contacted authors when further information was not available from the published articles.
Six RCTs involving 439 participants with dementia were included in the review, but no studies of participants with MCI were identified. The studies included people with dementia living in the community or in nursing home care and were carried out in several countries. Only one of the studies was classified as low risk of bias. Five studies were at unclear or high risk of bias due to uncertainties around randomisation, blinding and selective reporting of results. The studies used the different psychological approaches of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), interpersonal therapy and counselling. Two studies were of multimodal interventions including a specific psychological therapy. The comparison groups received either usual care, attention-control educational programs, diagnostic feedback or services slightly above usual care.Meta-analysis showed a positive effect of psychological treatments on depression (6 trials, 439 participants, standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.41 to -0.03, moderate quality evidence) and on clinician-rated anxiety (2 trials, 65 participants, mean difference (MD) -4.57; 95% CI -7.81 to -1.32, low quality evidence), but not on self-rated anxiety (2 trials, SMD 0.05; 95% CI -0.44 to 0.54) or carer-rated anxiety (1 trial, MD -2.40; 95% CI -4.96 to 0.16). Results were compatible with both benefit and harm on the secondary outcomes of patient quality of life, activities of daily living (ADLs), neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognition, or on carers' self-rated depressive symptoms, but most of the studies did not measure these outcomes. There were no reports of adverse events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence that psychological interventions added to usual care can reduce symptoms of depression and clinician-rated anxiety for people with dementia. We conclude that psychological interventions have the potential to improve patient well-being. Further high quality studies are needed to investigate which treatments are most effective and to evaluate the effect of psychological interventions in people with MCI.
在患有痴呆症和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的人群中,焦虑和抑郁很常见。心理干预被认为是针对这些人群的一种潜在治疗方法。目前的研究表明,患有痴呆症和MCI的人群接受旨在改善其幸福感的心理治疗的机会有限。对其有效性证据进行系统评价可能有助于改善患者的治疗效果,并为未来的实践提供建议。
本评价的主要目的是评估心理干预对减轻痴呆症或轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者焦虑和抑郁的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane痴呆与认知改善小组专业注册库以及其他已发表和未发表数据的来源。
我们纳入了将心理干预与痴呆症或MCI患者的常规护理或安慰剂干预(社交接触对照)进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位评价作者独立工作,使用数据提取表选择试验、提取数据并评估研究的偏倚风险。当从已发表文章中无法获得更多信息时,我们会联系作者。
本评价纳入了6项涉及439名痴呆症患者的RCT,但未发现关于MCI患者的研究。这些研究纳入了社区或养老院护理中的痴呆症患者,在多个国家开展。只有一项研究被归类为低偏倚风险。由于随机化、盲法和结果选择性报告方面存在不确定性,五项研究存在不明确或高偏倚风险。这些研究采用了认知行为疗法(CBT)、人际疗法和咨询等不同的心理方法。两项研究为多模式干预,包括一种特定的心理治疗。对照组接受常规护理、注意力控制教育项目、诊断反馈或略高于常规护理的服务。荟萃分析显示,心理治疗对抑郁有积极作用(6项试验,439名参与者,标准化均数差(SMD)-0.22;95%置信区间(CI)-0.41至-0.03,中等质量证据),对临床医生评定的焦虑也有积极作用(2项试验,65名参与者,均数差(MD)-4.57;95%CI -7.81至-1.32,低质量证据),但对自评焦虑(两项试验,SMD 0.05;95%CI -0.44至0.54)或照顾者评定的焦虑(一项试验,MD -2.40;95%CI -4.96至0.16)没有作用。结果在患者生活质量、日常生活活动(ADL)、神经精神症状和认知等次要结局方面,或照顾者自评抑郁症状方面,既有益处也有危害,但大多数研究未测量这些结局。没有不良事件报告。
我们发现有证据表明,在常规护理基础上增加心理干预可减轻痴呆症患者的抑郁症状和临床医生评定的焦虑。我们得出结论,心理干预有改善患者幸福感的潜力。需要进一步开展高质量研究,以调查哪种治疗最有效,并评估心理干预对MCI患者的效果。