Adelphi Real World, Adelphi Mill, Bollington, Macclesfield, SK10 5JB, UK,
Adv Ther. 2014 Feb;31(2):168-79. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0094-z. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, severely debilitating disease with high mortality. There are limited data available on treatment patterns and burden of disease from conditions of actual care.
This analysis assesses the burden of disease for patients with PAH treated with monotherapy and combination therapies excluding and including intravenous (IV) prostacyclin analogues (PGI2). Data were drawn from the Adelphi PAH Disease Specific Programme, a cross sectional survey of consulting patients undertaken in the US, Germany, Italy and the UK in 2010. Outcomes included demographics, clinical characteristics, health-care resource utilization, and quality of life measured by the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR).
Data were analyzed from 446 patients receiving ≥1 of 3 PAH-specific treatment classes. Physicians comprised mainly pulmonologists and cardiologists. The symptoms, functioning and quality of life scales of the CAMPHOR instrument were completed by 218, 229, and 214 patients, respectively. Although 46.2% of patients were classified as World Health Organization (WHO) functional class III or IV, only 24.4% of the population received combination therapy. Combination therapy including IV PGI2 was used in 4.7% of all patients. Patients on monotherapy had the lowest pulmonary vascular resistance values, the highest recorded 6-min walk distance and the lowest recorded levels of dyspnea. Patients on combination therapy including IV PGI2 scored worse on all three variables and had more hospitalizations than patients on less aggressive combination therapy. With increasing therapeutic regimens, the CAMPHOR scores were higher, indicating worse states of health.
Combination treatment and particularly the use of prostacyclins remain underused in an unselected population of PAH patients surveyed under conditions of actual care. The disease burden is substantial and increases with greater severity of disease and more aggressive treatments. This necessitates improvement in optimizing current therapy, as well as novel and innovative combination options.
肺动脉高压(PAH)是一种罕见的、严重致残性疾病,死亡率高。实际治疗情况下,关于治疗模式和疾病负担的数据有限。
本分析评估了接受单药治疗和联合治疗(包括和不包括静脉注射(IV)前列环素类似物(PGI2))的 PAH 患者的疾病负担。数据来自 Adelphi PAH 疾病专项计划,这是 2010 年在美国、德国、意大利和英国进行的一项咨询患者的横断面调查。结果包括人口统计学、临床特征、医疗资源利用以及通过剑桥肺动脉高压预后评估(CAMPHOR)测量的生活质量。
分析了 446 名接受≥1 种 PAH 特定治疗类别的患者的数据。医生主要是肺病专家和心脏病专家。CAMPHOR 仪器的症状、功能和生活质量量表分别由 218、229 和 214 名患者完成。尽管 46.2%的患者被归类为世界卫生组织(WHO)功能分类 III 或 IV 级,但只有 24.4%的患者接受联合治疗。包括 IV PGI2 的联合治疗在所有患者中占 4.7%。接受单药治疗的患者的肺血管阻力值最低,记录的 6 分钟步行距离最高,呼吸困难程度最低。接受包括 IV PGI2 的联合治疗的患者在所有三个变量上的评分都较差,并且住院次数多于接受不那么积极的联合治疗的患者。随着治疗方案的增加,CAMPHOR 评分越高,表明健康状况越差。
在实际治疗情况下,在未经选择的 PAH 患者中,联合治疗,特别是前列环素的使用仍然不足。在疾病负担是相当大的,随着疾病严重程度的增加和更积极的治疗而增加。这需要改进优化当前的治疗方案,以及新的和创新的联合治疗方案。